Monday, November 23, 2009

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6cq9yEVcGIU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6cq9yEVcGIU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4630 (20091123) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Senate Ethics Committee Admonishes Burris - It's Meaningless - Burris Should Resign

The Washington Post: "Sen. Roland W. Burris (D-IL) has been admonished by the Senate ethics committee for his public comments about his appointment last December to the body. In a three-page "public letter of qualified admonition" issued Friday, the committee formally reprimanded Burris for statements -- some made under oath to an Illinois legislative committee -- in which he denied trying to raise any campaign contributions for indicted former governor Rod Blagojevich for his political committees. . . . A letter of admonition is the mildest form of rebuke that the ethics committee can administer. "

Ozark Guru: Imagine calling in a gangster and saying we admonish you - go and sin no more. He would laugh himself to death. The Senate Ethics Committee admonishment is all fluff and meaningless and the end result is that Roland Burris remains a U.S. Senator. He benefits from lying under oath, collects his salary, remains part of the black caucus, votes with the Democrats to place American further into debt, gets to admonish fellow Senators and others who have more integrity from the floor of the Senate, and remains a breathing living example of what corruption and deceit can get you. At least, Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) has someone he can smugly to look down on.

Here we have just another example of Chicago politics roaming the halls of the White House and the halls of Congress. Is Burris, the US Senate, Washington D.C., and Illinois without honor? Makes one wish for the Japanese culture where the dishonored end their own disgrace. Burris was not elected. No, under oath, he lied his way into office and was accepted because of an apparent rush to appoint a Senator to support the Democrat agenda. And for some contorted reason, this appointment had to be a democrat black man to replace a former democrat black man who was just sworn in as President.  Talk about racial profiling - what an insult to men and women of any ethnic or political background in Illinois!  Metaphorically, both Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King must have rolled over in their graves. 

Former Gov. Rod Blagojevich must be chuckling at the joke he has played on Illinois and America in response to his being rejected by Barack Obama and his "advisers." Blago thought he was "loved" by them. Since Blago was not acceptable to join them (he should get down on his knees and thank God for this), he appointed Roland Burris who was worthy of them as now evidenced by the incompetence, lying and deceit which we have seen in the Obama administration and the Democrat controlled Congress. Being dishonorable seems to be a qualification these days in the Obama administration and the Senate ethics commission just rubber stamped their approval. Burris should resign! But then again, we haven't seen hell freeze over yet.

Trigger-Happy Muslims and Deluded Infidels in the Happy Land of Make-Believe

Trigger-Happy Muslims and Deluded Infidels in the Happy Land of Make-Believe
GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary
By Don Feder
11-19-09


        Let me tell you about the Happy Land of Make-Believe. It's a magical place where ideology trumps reality, evidence is irrelevant, and illusion reigns supreme.

        Liberals are permanent residents of the Happy Land of Make-Believe. Some conservatives are not immune to its allure.

        The Happy Land of Make-Believe is populated by journalists, academics, Democrats (and some Republicans), feminists, gay activists, pacifists, isolationists, socialists and other refugees from the real world. A resident of the Happy Land of Make-Believe may be identified by his blind faith in the following propositions:
 
 • That after marching 20 miles with a full pack, a 90-lb woman is every bit as effective in combat as a 190-lb. man 

 
 • That we can provide health insurance for millions who are currently uninsured and it will neither increase insurance costs, result in rationing or necessitate a general tax increase

 • That we can solve the problem of illegal immigration by bestowing amnesties on an estimated 12 million to 15 million of them, which – it goes without saying – won't send millions more heading for our borders.

 • That a man who's had himself mutilated and takes regular doses of female hormones is now a woman, his chromosomal makeup not withstanding

 • That criminals, psychopaths and jihadists obey gun laws

 • That a Palestinian state won't look like Dodge City on a Saturday night – with everyone on crack cocaine

 • That we can keep brutal regimes from acquiring nuclear weapons by confessing our sins and sending diplomats to sit around a conference table with them.

         The Happy Land of Make-Believe is built on one part wishful thinking, one part political correctness and one-part fear. In Make-Believe Land, acknowledging reality is insensitive and a crime against diversity. Unpleasant truths are ignored and cherished dogmas go unchallenged. Conceding the existence of evil admits that the world is a dangerous place and monsters must be confronted or the innocent will suffer.

        Nowhere is the Happy Land of Make-Believe more manifest than in the matter of Islam, Moslems and terrorism. Hence, the reaction to the Fort Hood murders.

        This we know of Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the man charged with 13 counts of murder:

        While he was shooting fellow soldiers, Hassan shouted "Allahu Akhbar!" (Allah is the greatest). Interesting, it's always cries of Allah-this or Allah-that which accompany acts of terrorism, never "Jesus saves!" or "Mazel Tov!"

        Despite having been born in the United States, Hasan listed his nationality as Palestinian.

        He was an avid proselytizer for Islam. At Walter Reed Hospital, where Dr. Hasan was a psychiatric intern and a psychiatrist for six years, he was reprimanded for trying to win converts to the religion of peace. Since, by definition, his patients all had mental problems, it's surprising he wasn't more successful. He also handed out Korans prior to the killing spree, thereby exemplifying cause and effect.

        While at Walter Reed, Hassan attended the radical Dar al-Hijrah mosque, in Falls Church, VA, at the same time as two of the 9/11 terrorists. Hasan became quite attached to the mosque's jihad-preaching imam, Anwar al-Awlaki, and stayed in touch with him via the Internet when al-Awlaki relocated to Yemen.

        Over the course of years, Hasan told his fellow officers that he believed the U.S. Army is at war with Muslims, that suicide bombers are like soldiers who throw themselves on live grenades to save their buddies, and that "Muslims have a right to rise up against the U.S. military." He also spoke approvingly of individuals who would "strap bombs on themselves and go into Times Square."

        Had an evangelical Christian serving in the military expressed the same sentiments (say by declaring that killing abortionists is justifiable homicide or that the U.S. government is at war with Christians) he would have been cashiered in no time flat. Other than mild reprimands, no disciplinary action was taken against Hasan. As another staff member at Walter Reed explained, "You don't want to close him down just because" his views are "different." Now, shut your eyes tightly and repeat after me: "Militant Islam is just different" and "you don't want to close down jihadist ravings."

        In 2007, Hasan did a show-and-tell for other personnel at the hospital, in the form of a slide presentation on "The Koranic World View As it Relates to Muslims in the Military." Slide #11 observed, "It's getting harder and harder to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims."

        None of this alerted his colleagues, the brass or the FBI to Hasan's potential to go Islamic. Their answer was to order him to take comparative religion courses, which was supposed to encourage him to love Christians and Jews.

        All that was missing was the good doctor wearing a name tag that said: "Hi, I'm Major Nidal Hasan. Where the infidels at?"

        The commander in chief, the media and the generals are in deep denial about Hasan's motivation.

        "It is unclear what might have motivated Major Hasan," The New York Times declared in its initial report.   ("Allahu Akhbar" wasn't a dead giveaway?) A follow-up story was headlined "Told of War Horror, Gunman Feared Deployment" – a sort of pre-post-traumatic stress syndrome. Yes, Dr. Hasan would have been in the thick of things. A lot of shrinks come back from Afghanistan missing a clipboard or a prescription pad.

        Associated Press, The Washington Post and National Public Radio initially hadn't a clue as to why a swell guy like Hasan would open fire on fellow soldiers. (Hint: It was Major Hasan, in the Soldier Readiness Center, with a Koran and a 5.7-millimeter handgun, shouting "Allah is Groovy!")

        Interviewed on "Meet the Press," on November 8, Army Chief of Staff General William Casey (who missed his calling as a sensitivity trainer) pleaded: "Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that's worse."

        Here is the ideal warrior for the Age of Obama. Casey should demonstrate his commitment to diversity by offering to lead a squad of randomly picked Muslim GIs on a mission in Afghanistan – all of whom are behind him with loaded weapons.

        Barack Obama is the mayor of the Happy Land of Make-Believe. Speaking at a memorial service at Fort Hood on November 10th, President My-Job-is-to-Fight-Negative-Stereotypes-of-Islam told mourners that the "twisted logic that led to the tragedy" was "too hard to comprehend."

        Now, if Major Hasan had been a follower of Mother Theresa or Mahatma Gandhi, whose teachings he interpreted as a license to kill, that would be twisted logic.

        As a Moslem who takes his faith seriously, what Major Hasan did is perfectly comprehensible. The U.S. Army is killing Moslems. Members of the religion of peace have a sacred duty to protect their co-religionists. America is evil. Suicide bombing is justified. Oh yes, and, as Hasan explained to his colleagues during his slide presentation, "We (Muslims) love death more than you (infidels) love life."

        In the Happy Land of Make Believe, Islam is a warm and cuddly creed, worthy of respect bordering on reverence --1,500 years of evidence notwithstanding. Moslem militants don't understand their own religion. Jihad really means a spiritual struggle, not the slaughter of unbelievers. The scholars and religious authorities of Cairo's Al Azhar, the citadel of Sunni orthodoxy, are pulling our legs when they proclaim, "Jihad means to war against non-Muslims" to establish the supremacy of Islam.

        Thus, every act of terrorism becomes a misunderstanding or a symptom of mental illness. Would that Moslems only understood their religion as well as Obama, Casey, Condolezza Rice (who once dubbed Islam "the religion of love and peace"), George W. Bush, and The New York Times.

        In all likelihood, our president also finds the following just too hard to comprehend:

 • The 2005 Kuwait grenade attack by U.S. Army Sgt. Hasan Akbar, killing two officers and wounding 14 others. The delusional Hasan, who clearly was ignorant of the wonderful teachings of the Koran, told investigators that he launched the attack to keep servicemen from killing his fellow Muslims in Iraq, where they were about to be deployed. Sound familiar?

 • The plot by five Moslems to attack Fort Dix in 2007, and kill as many soldiers as they could

 • That, according to FBI counter-terrorism officials, jihad is preached at one in ten of the 2,000 mosques in the United States. (And that's what they know about.) We need a federal program to teach Islam to imams.

 • The June shooting spree at an Arkansas recruiting station by misinformed Moslem Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, that left one serviceman dead. Did Muhammad fear deployment to Afghanistan?

 • Four Moslems arrested in Newburgh, N.Y., in May, charged with plotting to blow up synagogues and a Jewish community center in the Big Apple. When they were arraigned in federal court, Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Snyder said the defendants were "eager to bring death to Jews and the Jewish community."

 • D.C. sniper John Muhammad, who was executed last week for 10 random homicides in 2002. Why is it those who kill for their religion are never named Jimmy Jesus or Milt Moses?

 • Muzzamil Hassan, founder of Bridges TV – whose mission was to showcase the many examples of "Muslim tolerance, progress, diversity, service and excellence" – arrested on February 12 and charged with cutting off his wife's head after she threatened to divorce him. Perhaps it was a peaceful decapitation.

        • Khalid Kelly (I kid you not), an Irishman living in Pakistan, who told the London Times that he wanted to wage jihad (not the spiritual-struggle kind) against U.S. and British troops. "I'm already on the path to jihad. I've already picked up a gun and done target practice to make myself familiar with weapons," Paddy O'Dynamite Belt declared in a November 15 interview. "Next week, inshallah (Allah willing), I could be in Afghanistan fighting a British soldier." Kelly also told The Times he hopes his son Osama, age 3, will become a martyr "before marriageable age."

 • All of the hijackings, suicide bombings, beheadings of captives and honor killings committed in the name of the peaceable faith, including the 9/11 attacks and the estimated 24,879 Indians murdered by Islamic terrorists during 1994-2005.

        In the happy Land of Make-Believe, when 13 American heroes are murdered in cold blood, we may pause to shed a tear, then obsess about how this might threaten diversity, our new national credo.

        We should be thankful that the Happy Land of Make-Believe was as yet uncharted territory in 1941. Imagine Gen. Douglas McArthur worrying about how Pearl Harbor might negatively impact on the German-American Bund, and President Roosevelt telling Americans that Nazism and Bushido were all about tolerance, brotherhood and love.

Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant. He also maintains his own website, DonFeder.com.

MyHeritage.org: The Senate health care bill: no improvement



November 20, 2009 | By Amanda Reinecker

The Senate health care bill: no improvement


Congress has outdone itself. On Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled a health care bill weighing in at 2,074 pages, a new record. A vote on the bill is expected Saturday.

Heritage Foundation experts are still working through the specifics of the massive, $849 billion health care bill, as it is estimated to take up to 34 hours to read the entire thing. But they already know that "the major outlines of the bill are no different than the policy train wreck the House passed earlier this month," reports Heritage's Conn Carroll.
Both the House and Senate health care "reform" bills include:
  1. A government "option." Both the House and Senate proposals would create a one-size-fits-all public plan to "compete" with private insurers. But the government will retain its role as regulator and thus stifle any competition and causing millions to lose their private coverage.
  2. More people in failed programs. Both bills would place millions of Americans under the failing government-run Medicaid program, reducing subsidized benefits from those who truly need them and increasing the financial burden on the states.
  3. Employer mandates. All employers of 50 people or more will be required to provide coverage that meets new federal standards or else face a hefty penalty. This mandate will disproportionately impact low-income workers.
  4. Individual mandates. For the first time in history, all Americans will be forced to purchase federally approved coverage minimums. Those who fail to comply are subject to new tax penalties and, in some cases, jail time.
The bill's supporters may be congratulating each other for producing a health care bill that meets the President's $900 billion cap. But its $849 price tag is a preliminary estimate only, and it really only has one place to go -- up. "As history has proven, government health care programs end up costing much more than first promised," writes Carroll.
Both the House and Senate health care reform bills require individuals to purchase federally-approved health insurance, and those who fail to do so could face criminal prosecution. "Using [criminal law] to enforce one particular notion of appropriate insurance coverage is nothing less than a tyrannical assertion of raw government power over the private lives and economic rights of individual Americans," write Heritage legal scholars Brian Walsh and Hans von Spakovsky. This abuse of governmental power does not bode well for freedom, as it specifically targets those who choose to make their own decisions regarding their health insurance.
Visit Heritage's FixHealthCarePolicy.com to read the entire Senate health care bill and to find more in-depth analyses as our analysts continue to dissect this massive legislation.

Protecting America's interests in Copenhagen

In December, members of the United Nations Framework Convention will meet in Copenhagen to discuss climate change and draft a new global warming treaty. "This is the most important international conference on global warming since the 1997 Kyoto conference that produced Kyoto Protocol," writes Heritage expert Ben Lieberman.
The Kyoto Protocol is an international environmental treaty which the United States never ratified because of the overwhelming financial and regulatory burdens it would impose on the country. Set to expire in 2012, however, the Kyoto Protocol is now the prototype for a new, even more stringent global warming treaty that would pose an even greater threat to American prosperity than its predecessor.
Lieberman explains how a new global warming treaty would hurt America:
  • Inflicting economic harm. The contemplated global warming treaty -- like the highly controversial cap-and-trade legislation under consideration in Congress -- would act as a large energy tax that would drive up energy costs for individuals and consumers. This would result in massive job losses.
  • Achieving little environmental gain. Leaving aside all scientific questions about global warming, the treaty's targeted emissions reductions will have a nominal, if any, impact on the earth's temperature. This is especially true if developing nations, whose emissions are growing fastest, remain exempt, as they are under Kyoto.
  • Undermining U.S. sovereignty. Unlike the Kyoto Protocol, a new global warming treaty would impose binding international enforcement mechanisms. An international authority will be established to ensure that all signatories are in compliance with the international provisions, as well as to determine penalties for non-complying entities.
Countless studies from both sides of the political aisle reveal the devastating effects of global warming controls. This is why cap-and-trade legislation has been stalled in the U.S. Senate.
President Obama has repeatedly promised to reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions and he is under immense pressure from radical environmentalist groups to keep this pledge. But surrendering American prosperity and sovereignty is no bargain.
"The American people need to know that, in addition to harming the U.S. economically and environmentally, a new global warming treaty would threaten U.S. sovereignty," explains Lieberman.  The United States' decision not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol was a prudent one that served America's best interests. In Copenhagen this December, American negotiators should again keep our best interests in mind.

> Other Heritage work of note

  • "It is a tragic mistake to now bring the detained war combatants into the United States and to employ civilian criminal procedures which were never intended for this type of situation," former Attorney General and Heritage scholar Edwin Meese said this week. Last Friday, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and five other terrorists would be tried in a civilian court in New York City rather than before a military tribunal. This decision blurs the distinction between crimes and acts of war, which are handled in military tribunals, not civilian court.

    » Read Meese's full statement online
  • To prevent a "rerun of the Great Crash of 2008" and stave off the need for bailouts, Heritage Vice President Stuart Butler suggests reforming bankruptcy policy. "Without a realistic bankruptcy option, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and then-Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. had to make it up on the fly, often stopping up the breaking dam with taxpayers' money." To prevent further bailouts, we should enact serious reforms that "give the bankruptcy courts the tools they need to take care of failing giants."
  • In less than a year, the Pelosi-Reid Congress has introduced four nation-altering proposals: the $787 billion economic stimulus plan, the massive 2010 budget plan, cap-and-trade legislation, and health care reform. Heritage Vice President Michael Franc points out that "House Republicans have been virtually unanimous in their opposition to this agenda, but House Democrats have been divided in important ways." The Left has kept this ambitious schedule despite the split between moderate liberals and radical progressives, Franc argues, because of "the San Francisco speaker's ability to persuade her troops to line up behind a breathtakingly liberal legislative agenda."

> In other news

  • "South Carolina lawmakers plan to formally consider impeaching Gov. Mark Sanford for the first time next week," the AP reports.
Amanda Reinecker is a writer for MyHeritage.org-- a website for members and supporters of The Heritage Foundation. Nathaniel Ward, the Editor of MyHeritage.org, contributed to this report.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Abortion Aspirn

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?


On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty that is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Congress on Federal Healthcare

Friday, November 13, 2009

Define Arrogance

Our European arrogance in alphabetical order
1. The American Cemetery at Aisne-Marne , France . A total of 2289 of our military dead.
2. The American Cemetery at Ardennes , Belgium . A total of 5329 of our dead.
3. The American Cemetery at Brittany, France . A total of 4410 of our military dead. Excuse us.
4. Brookwood , England American Cemetery. A total of 468 of our dead.
5. Cambridge , England .. 3812 of our military dead.
6. Epinal , France American Cemetery. A total of 5525 of our Military dead..
7. Flanders Field , Belgium . A total of 368 of our military.
8. Florence , Italy . A total of 4402 of our military dead.
9. Henri-Chapelle , Belgium . A total of 7992 of our military dead.
10. Lorraine , France . A total of 10,489 of our military dead...
11. Luxembourg , Luxembourg . A total of 5076 of our military dead.
12. Meuse-Argonne. A total of 14246 of our military dead.
13. Netherlands , Netherlands . A total of 8301 of our military dead.
14. Normandy , France . A total of 9387 of our military dead.
15. Oise-Aisne , France . A total of 6012 of our military dead..
16. Rhone , France . A total of 861 of our military dead.
17. Sicily , Italy . A total of 7861 of our military dead.
18. Somme , France . A total of 1844 of our military dead.
19. St. Mihiel , France . A total of 4153 of our military dead..
20. Suresnes , France . a total of 1541 of our military dead.
Apologize to no one.
Remind those of our sacrifice and don't confuse arrogance with leadership.
If I added correctly the count is 
104,366 dead.
And we have to watch an American elected leader who apologizes to Europe and the Middle East that our country is "arrogant"!
HOW MANY FRENCH, DUTCH, ITALIANS, BELGIANS AND BRITS ARE BURIED ON OUR SOIL, DEFENDING US AGAINST OUR ENEMIES?
WE DON'T ASK FOR PRAISE ... BUT WE HAVE ABSOULUTELY NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE!!

PLEASE---- DO  NOT  DELETE,  DO THINK ABOUT THIS.    THANK YOU.
I hope you remember this when election time comes around again.

The Blinders - Jihad at Ft Hood

Old stream media has PC blinders on. Read the "Jihad at Fort Hood" series for non-Politically Correct insights into the background on the murder of "14" and wounding of 30 American military and civilians at Ft Hood, Texas.

Follows is an insightful cartoon by William Warren

[Source]

Monday, November 09, 2009

House Vote 887 - H.R.3962 On Passage - NYTimes.com

House Vote 887 - H.R.3962: On Passage Affordable Health Care for America Act


To provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans and reduce the growth in health care spending, and for other purposes.Full text of the bill »

  • Result: Passed by 5 votes
  • Date of Vote: November 7, 2009
  • Roll Call Number: 887

Complete Roll Call

Yes Votes (220)

Member
Party
Dist.
Neil Abercrombie
D
HI-1
Gary L. Ackerman
D
NY-5
Robert E. Andrews
D
NJ-1
Michael Arcuri
D
NY-24
Xavier Becerra
D
CA-31
Howard L. Berman
D
CA-28
Marion Berry
D
AR-1
Sanford D. Bishop Jr.
D
GA-2
Earl Blumenauer
D
OR-3
Leonard L. Boswell
D
IA-3
Corrine Brown
D
FL-3
Robert A. Brady
D
PA-1
Tammy Baldwin
D
WI-2
Shelley Berkley
D
NV-1
Joe Baca
D
CA-43
Timothy H. Bishop
D
NY-1
G. K. Butterfield
D
NC-1
Melissa Bean
D
IL-8
Bruce Braley
D
IA-1
James E. Clyburn
D
SC-6
John Conyers Jr.
D
MI-14
Jim Cooper
D
TN-5
Jerry F. Costello
D
IL-12
Elijah E. Cummings
D
MD-7
Lois Capps
D
CA-23
Michael E. Capuano
D
MA-8
Joseph Crowley
D
NY-7
William Lacy Clay
D
MO-1
Dennis Cardoza
D
CA-18
Jim Costa
D
CA-20
Russ Carnahan
D
MO-3
Emanuel Cleaver II
D
MO-5
Henry Cuellar
D
TX-28
Christopher Carney
D
PA-10
Kathy Castor
D
FL-11
Yvette Clarke
D
NY-11
Steve Cohen
D
TN-9
Joe Courtney
D
CT-2
André Carson
D
IN-7
Gerald E. Connolly
D
VA-11
Anh Cao
R
LA-2
Judy Chu
D
CA-32
Danny K. Davis
D
IL-7
Peter A. DeFazio
D
OR-4
Diana DeGette
D
CO-1
Bill Delahunt
D
MA-10
Rosa DeLauro
D
CT-3
Norman D. Dicks
D
WA-6
John D. Dingell
D
MI-15
Lloyd Doggett
D
TX-25
Mike Doyle
D
PA-14
Susan A. Davis
D
CA-53
Joe Donnelly
D
IN-2
Kathy Dahlkemper
D
PA-3
Steve Driehaus
D
OH-1
Eliot L. Engel
D
NY-17
Anna G. Eshoo
D
CA-14
Bob Etheridge
D
NC-2
Keith Ellison
D
MN-5
Brad Ellsworth
D
IN-8
Donna Edwards
D
MD-4
Sam Farr
D
CA-17
Chaka Fattah
D
PA-2
Bob Filner
D
CA-51
Barney Frank
D
MA-4
Bill Foster
D
IL-14
Marcia L. Fudge
D
OH-11
Gene Green
D
TX-29
Luis V. Gutierrez
D
IL-4
Charlie Gonzalez
D
TX-20
Raúl M. Grijalva
D
AZ-7
Al Green
D
TX-9
Gabrielle Giffords
D
AZ-8
Alan Grayson
D
FL-8
John Garamendi
D
CA-10
Jane Harman
D
CA-36
Alcee L. Hastings
D
FL-23
Maurice D. Hinchey
D
NY-22
Rubén Hinojosa
D
TX-15
Steny H. Hoyer
D
MD-5
Baron P. Hill
D
IN-9
Rush Holt
D
NJ-12
Michael M. Honda
D
CA-15
Brian Higgins
D
NY-27
John Hall
D
NY-19
Phil Hare
D
IL-17
Mazie K. Hirono
D
HI-2
Paul W. Hodes
D
NH-2
Debbie Halvorson
D
IL-11
Martin Heinrich
D
NM-1
Jim Himes
D
CT-4
Jay Inslee
D
WA-1
Steve Israel
D
NY-2
Sheila Jackson-Lee
D
TX-18
Eddie Bernice Johnson
D
TX-30
Jesse L. Jackson Jr.
D
IL-2
Hank Johnson
D
GA-4
Paul E. Kanjorski
D
PA-11
Marcy Kaptur
D
OH-9
Patrick J. Kennedy
D
RI-1
Dale E. Kildee
D
MI-5
Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick
D
MI-13
Ron Kind
D
WI-3
Steve Kagen
D
WI-8
Ron Klein
D
FL-22
Ann Kirkpatrick
D
AZ-1
Mary Jo Kilroy
D
OH-15
Sander M. Levin
D
MI-12
John Lewis
D
GA-5
Zoe Lofgren
D
CA-16
Nita M. Lowey
D
NY-18
Barbara Lee
D
CA-9
John B. Larson
D
CT-1
Jim Langevin
D
RI-2
Rick Larsen
D
WA-2
Stephen F. Lynch
D
MA-9
Daniel Lipinski
D
IL-3
Dave Loebsack
D
IA-2
Ben Ray Lujan
D
NM-3
Carolyn B. Maloney
D
NY-14
Edward J. Markey
D
MA-7
Carolyn McCarthy
D
NY-4
Jim McGovern
D
MA-3
Jim McDermott
D
WA-7
George Miller
D
CA-7
Alan B. Mollohan
D
WV-1
James P. Moran
D
VA-8
John P. Murtha
D
PA-12
Gregory W. Meeks
D
NY-6
Dennis Moore
D
KS-3
Betty McCollum
D
MN-4
Kendrick B. Meek
D
FL-17
Michael H. Michaud
D
ME-2
Brad Miller
D
NC-13
Gwen Moore
D
WI-4
Doris Matsui
D
CA-5
Jerry McNerney
D
CA-11
Harry E. Mitchell
D
AZ-5
Patrick J. Murphy
D
PA-8
Christopher S. Murphy
D
CT-5
Dan Maffei
D
NY-25
Jerrold Nadler
D
NY-8
Richard E. Neal
D
MA-2
Grace F. Napolitano
D
CA-38
James L. Oberstar
D
MN-8
David R. Obey
D
WI-7
John W. Olver
D
MA-1
Solomon P. Ortiz
D
TX-27
Bill Owens
D
NY-23
Frank Pallone
D
NJ-6
Bill Pascrell Jr.
D
NJ-8
Ed Pastor
D
AZ-4
Donald M. Payne
D
NJ-10
Nancy Pelosi
D
CA-8
Earl Pomeroy
D
ND-1
David E. Price
D
NC-4
Ed Perlmutter
D
CO-7
Gary Peters
D
MI-9
Chellie Pingree
D
ME-1
Jared Polis
D
CO-2
Tom Perriello
D
VA-5
Mike Quigley
D
IL-5
Nick J. Rahall II
D
WV-3
Charles B. Rangel
D
NY-15
Silvestre Reyes
D
TX-16
Steven R. Rothman
D
NJ-9
Lucille Roybal-Allard
D
CA-34
Bobby L. Rush
D
IL-1
Ciro D. Rodriguez
D
TX-23
C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger
D
MD-2
Tim Ryan
D
OH-17
Laura Richardson
D
CA-37
Loretta Sanchez
D
CA-47
Robert C. Scott
D
VA-3
José E. Serrano
D
NY-16
Brad Sherman
D
CA-27
Louise M. Slaughter
D
NY-28
Adam Smith
D
WA-9
Vic Snyder
D
AR-2
John M. Spratt Jr.
D
SC-5
Pete Stark
D
CA-13
Bart Stupak
D
MI-1
Jan Schakowsky
D
IL-9
Adam B. Schiff
D
CA-29
Linda T. Sanchez
D
CA-39
David Scott
D
GA-13
John Salazar
D
CO-3
Allyson Y. Schwartz
D
PA-13
Albio Sires
D
NJ-13
John Sarbanes
D
MD-3
Joe Sestak
D
PA-7
Carol Shea-Porter
D
NH-1
Zack Space
D
OH-18
Betty Sutton
D
OH-13
Jackie Speier
D
CA-12
Mark Schauer
D
MI-7
Kurt Schrader
D
OR-5
Bennie Thompson
D
MS-2
John F. Tierney
D
MA-6
Edolphus Towns
D
NY-10
Mike Thompson
D
CA-1
Niki Tsongas
D
MA-5
Dina Titus
D
NV-3
Paul Tonko
D
NY-21
Nydia M. Velázquez
D
NY-12
Peter J. Visclosky
D
IN-1
Chris Van Hollen
D
MD-8
Maxine Waters
D
CA-35
Melvin Watt
D
NC-12
Henry A. Waxman
D
CA-30
Robert Wexler
D
FL-19
Lynn Woolsey
D
CA-6
Anthony Weiner
D
NY-9
David Wu
D
OR-1
Diane Watson
D
CA-33
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
D
FL-20
Tim Walz
D
MN-1
Peter Welch
D
VT-1
Charlie Wilson
D
OH-6
John Yarmuth
D
KY-3

No Votes (215)

Member
Party
Dist.
Robert B. Aderholt
R
AL-4
Todd Akin
R
MO-2
Rodney Alexander
R
LA-5
Jason Altmire
D
PA-4
John Adler
D
NJ-3
Steve Austria
R
OH-7
Spencer Bachus
R
AL-6
Roscoe G. Bartlett
R
MD-6
Joe L. Barton
R
TX-6
Brian P. Bilbray
R
CA-50
Roy Blunt
R
MO-7
John A. Boehner
R
OH-8
Rick Boucher
D
VA-9
Allen Boyd
D
FL-2
Kevin Brady
R
TX-8
Dan Burton
R
IN-5
Steve Buyer
R
IN-4
Mary Bono Mack
R
CA-45
Brian Baird
D
WA-3
Judy Biggert
R
IL-13
Henry E. Brown Jr.
R
SC-1
John Boozman
R
AR-3
J. Gresham Barrett
R
SC-3
Marsha Blackburn
R
TN-7
Jo Bonner
R
AL-1
Ginny Brown-Waite
R
FL-5
Michael C. Burgess
R
TX-26
Rob Bishop
R
UT-1
John Barrow
D
GA-12
Dan Boren
D
OK-2
Charles Boustany Jr.
R
LA-7
Michele Bachmann
R
MN-6
Gus Bilirakis
R
FL-9
Vern Buchanan
R
FL-13
Paul Broun
R
GA-10
John Boccieri
D
OH-16
Bobby Bright
D
AL-2
Ken Calvert
R
CA-44
Dave Camp
R
MI-4
Michael N. Castle
R
DE-1
Howard Coble
R
NC-6
Ander Crenshaw
R
FL-4
Eric Cantor
R
VA-7
Shelley Moore Capito
R
WV-2
John Culberson
R
TX-7
John Carter
R
TX-31
Tom Cole
R
OK-4
Ben Chandler
D
KY-6
K. Michael Conaway
R
TX-11
John Campbell
R
CA-48
Travis Childers
D
MS-1
Bill Cassidy
R
LA-6
Jason Chaffetz
R
UT-3
Mike Coffman
R
CO-6
Nathan Deal
R
GA-9
Lincoln Diaz-Balart
R
FL-21
David Dreier
R
CA-26
John J. Duncan Jr.
R
TN-2
Lincoln Davis
D
TN-4
Mario Diaz-Balart
R
FL-25
Artur Davis
D
AL-7
Geoff Davis
R
KY-4
Charlie Dent
R
PA-15
Chet Edwards
D
TX-17
Vernon J. Ehlers
R
MI-3
Jo Ann Emerson
R
MO-8
Rodney Frelinghuysen
R
NJ-11
Jeff Flake
R
AZ-6
J. Randy Forbes
R
VA-4
Trent Franks
R
AZ-2
Jeff Fortenberry
R
NE-1
Virginia Foxx
R
NC-5
Mary Fallin
R
OK-5
John Fleming
R
LA-4
Elton Gallegly
R
CA-24
Robert W. Goodlatte
R
VA-6
Bart Gordon
D
TN-6
Kay Granger
R
TX-12
Sam Graves
R
MO-6
Scott Garrett
R
NJ-5
Jim Gerlach
R
PA-6
Phil Gingrey
R
GA-11
Louie Gohmert
R
TX-1
Parker Griffith
D
AL-5
Brett Guthrie
R
KY-2
Ralph M. Hall
R
TX-4
Doc Hastings
R
WA-4
Wally Herger
R
CA-2
Peter Hoekstra
R
MI-2
Tim Holden
D
PA-17
Jeb Hensarling
R
TX-5
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
D
SD-1
Dean Heller
R
NV-2
Gregg Harper
R
MS-3
Duncan D. Hunter
R
CA-52
Bob Inglis
R
SC-4
Darrell Issa
R
CA-49
Sam Johnson
R
TX-3
Walter B. Jones
R
NC-3
Timothy V. Johnson
R
IL-15
Jim Jordan
R
OH-4
Lynn Jenkins
R
KS-2
Peter T. King
R
NY-3
Jack Kingston
R
GA-1
Dennis J. Kucinich
D
OH-10
Mark Steven Kirk
R
IL-10
Steve King
R
IA-5
John Kline
R
MN-2
Larry Kissell
D
NC-8
Suzanne Kosmas
D
FL-24
Frank Kratovil Jr.
D
MD-1
Tom Latham
R
IA-4
Jerry Lewis
R
CA-41
John Linder
R
GA-7
Frank D. Lucas
R
OK-3
Dan Lungren
R
CA-3
Steven C. LaTourette
R
OH-14
Frank A. LoBiondo
R
NJ-2
Doug Lamborn
R
CO-5
Robert E. Latta
R
OH-5
Leonard Lance
R
NJ-7
Christopher Lee
R
NY-26
Blaine Luetkemeyer
R
MO-9
Cynthia M. Lummis
R
WY-1
Mike McIntyre
D
NC-7
Howard P. McKeon
R
CA-25
John L. Mica
R
FL-7
Jerry Moran
R
KS-1
Sue Myrick
R
NC-9
Donald Manzullo
R
IL-16
Gary G. Miller
R
CA-42
Jim Matheson
D
UT-2
Jeff Miller
R
FL-1
Jim Marshall
D
GA-8
Thaddeus McCotter
R
MI-11
Candice S. Miller
R
MI-10
Tim Murphy
R
PA-18
Connie Mack
R
FL-14
Patrick T. McHenry
R
NC-10
Michael McCaul
R
TX-10
Kenny Marchant
R
TX-24
Cathy McMorris Rodgers
R
WA-5
Charlie Melancon
D
LA-3
Kevin McCarthy
R
CA-22
Betsy Markey
D
CO-4
Eric Massa
D
NY-29
Michael E. McMahon
D
NY-13
Walt Minnick
D
ID-1
Tom McClintock
R
CA-4
Scott Murphy
D
NY-20
Devin Nunes
R
CA-21
Randy Neugebauer
R
TX-19
Glenn Nye
D
VA-2
Pete Olson
R
TX-22
Collin C. Peterson
D
MN-7
Tom Petri
R
WI-6
Joe Pitts
R
PA-16
Ron Paul
R
TX-14
Todd R. Platts
R
PA-19
Adam H. Putnam
R
FL-12
Mike Pence
R
IN-6
Tom Price
R
GA-6
Ted Poe
R
TX-2
Erik Paulsen
R
MN-3
Bill Posey
R
FL-15
George P. Radanovich
R
CA-19
Harold Rogers
R
KY-5
Dana Rohrabacher
R
CA-46
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
R
FL-18
Ed Royce
R
CA-40
Paul D. Ryan
R
WI-1
Denny Rehberg
R
MT-1
Mike Rogers
R
MI-8
Mike Ross
D
AR-4
Mike D. Rogers
R
AL-3
Dave Reichert
R
WA-8
Peter Roskam
R
IL-6
Phil Roe
R
TN-1
Tom Rooney
R
FL-16
F. James Sensenbrenner
R
WI-5
Pete Sessions
R
TX-32
John Shadegg
R
AZ-3
John Shimkus
R
IL-19
Ike Skelton
D
MO-4
Christopher H. Smith
R
NJ-4
Lamar Smith
R
TX-21
Cliff Stearns
R
FL-6
Mark Souder
R
IN-3
Mike Simpson
R
ID-2
Bill Shuster
R
PA-9
John Sullivan
R
OK-1
Jean Schmidt
R
OH-2
Heath Shuler
D
NC-11
Adrian Smith
R
NE-3
Steve Scalise
R
LA-1
Aaron Schock
R
IL-18
John Tanner
D
TN-8
Gene Taylor
D
MS-4
William M. Thornberry
R
TX-13
Todd Tiahrt
R
KS-4
Lee Terry
R
NE-2
Pat Tiberi
R
OH-12
Michael R. Turner
R
OH-3
Harry Teague
D
NM-2
Glenn Thompson
R
PA-5
Fred Upton
R
MI-6
Zach Wamp
R
TN-3
Edward Whitfield
R
KY-1
Frank R. Wolf
R
VA-10
Greg Walden
R
OR-2
Joe Wilson
R
SC-2
Lynn Westmoreland
R
GA-3
Robert J. Wittman
R
VA-1
C. W. Bill Young
R
FL-10
Don Young
R
AK-1

Did Not Vote (0)



Friday, November 06, 2009

Ronald Reagan Celebrates Fall of Berlin Wall

By: Rich Noyes: On June 12, 1987, as the liberal media elite were toasting the leader of the Soviet Union as a great champion of progress, President Ronald Reagan stood at the Berlin Wall and challenged Mikhail Gorbachev to put his money where his mouth was: "General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"

Gorbachev did not open the gate or tear down the Berlin Wall, but two years later the people of East Germany did. News broke in the U.S. late in the afternoon (Eastern Time) on November 9, 1989 that the communist government would no longer restrict travel to West Berlin. Just a few hours later, ABC's PrimeTime Live hosted former President Ronald Reagan to celebrate what would turn out to be the death blow against communism in Eastern Europe. We found the tape in our archives, and posted a video excerpt at right. (Audio excerpt here.)

Co-anchor Sam Donaldson, who as White House correspondent had been a liberal antagonist during Reagan's presidency, told the former President he would "get a lot of credit for helping bring this moment about." Reagan told Donaldson that although he did not know when the Wall would finally fall, " I'm an eternal optimist. I believed with all my heart that it was in the future."

Reagan declared: "People have seen that Communism has had its chance and it doesn't work."

He also reminded Donaldson that on his visit to Berlin two years earlier, he witnessed the East German police forcing people away from the gate so they could not hear Reagan's speech over a loudspeaker. "So there was another sign of their system and how it worked with their own people. They just manhandled them and turned them around and would not let them, even though they were staying in East Germany, not let them come near the Wall."

Here's a transcript of that interview, conducted just a few hours after the Berlin Wall opened up on November 9, 1989:

CO-ANCHOR SAM DONALDSON: A lot of political leaders over the years, since 1961, in the West, have urged that that Wall be torn down, but the one, I think, that people remember the most at this moment — and who's going to get a lot of credit for helping bring this moment about — is former President Ronald Reagan, who joins us live tonight from his office in Los Angeles. Mr. President, glad to see you. Thank you for joining us.

PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN: Well, thank you, Sam. It's a great pleasure to be, well, in a way, talking with you again.

DONALDSON: Well, two years ago, when you stood in front of the Wall — and we've shown those pictures tonight — and you challenged, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall," did you think it would come this soon?
PRESIDENT REAGAN: Well, I didn't know when it would come, but I have to tell you, I'm an eternal optimist. I believed with all my heart that it was in the future, because that's a single country. This isn't a thing of a division with two groups of people, or two different types of people brought together within boundaries. These are Germans on each side of the Wall, and the only reason that Wall is there, and there was a difference, was because East Germany was under the domination of the Soviet military when the war ended. And they didn't have any say about what they could do, or what kind of government they would have.

DONALDSON: Well, I know you made this point publicly many times. In your conversations with Gorbachev, and at the end you got to be quite intimate, from the standpoint of being able to talk to him one-on-one, did you discuss the Wall, and what did he say?

PRESIDENT REAGAN: No, not really. We- I got into the kind of generalities with him about human rights, mainly. And then, of course, the things that we were talking specifically about, arms reduction and so forth, and I remember telling him — it wasn't original with me, but I told him — that we didn't mistrust each other because we were armed. We were armed because we mistrust each other. And if we were going to talk about reducing arms, why don't we try to get together on reducing the things that make for the mistrust between us. And he didn't disagree with that. And at the same time, contrary to what some critics have said, I never believed that we should just assume that everything was going to be all right. And that's why I learned a Russian proverb which I used on him a great deal, doveryai, no proveryai. He got to the place that he would clap his hands over his ears when I said it. It means, "Trust, but verify."

DONALDSON: Well, are you of the opinion, with Gorbachev beset by all of the problems and troubles that he has at the moment, that he is going to survive, that perestroika is going to prosper?

PRESIDENT REAGAN: Well, I have to believe that, but I do know that the great threat to what he is trying to do does not come from outside his borders. It comes from that hard-core political Communist bureaucracy that has a vested interest in keeping that kind of totalitarian government. So maybe if he doesn't move as fast as we would like to see him move, it's because he knows that that threat is there behind him. Now, by the same token, I think that those people who threaten him, those hard-core Communists, must by now have seen the changing attitude on the part of the people and they must be a little disturbed about doing something that would bring them toe to toe against their own people in the streets.

DONALDSON: Do you think the United States can do something — it's a question often asked, and I know you've wrestled with it — can do something, or should we do something, to help Gorbachev?

PRESIDENT REAGAN: Well, yes, I think we can, and I think we have been doing these things, by continuing these meetings with him and to deal with him, negotiating with him. I used to bring him handwritten lists of dissenters that had been brought to my attention in the Soviet Union. And every time we met, I would present him with one of these lists and ask him if it was possible that these people could be allowed to emigrate. And very shortly I would get word that these people were on their way, many times to the United States. So I believe that, as long as he's performing the way that he's performing, we should do whatever we could that might be of help, and yet, at the same time, short of interfering or rousing the enemy within his own borders.

DONALDSON: A moment ago, you said that it was unnatural for the two Germanys to be apart, that they were all Germans. Do you believe that we're going to move rapidly toward a reunification of Germany? Do you think our European allies want that?

PRESIDENT REAGAN: I think they do. Now, I don't know how soon this can come. But again, as I say, these people are Germans, living on each side of that Wall. They didn't have much to do with the building of that Wall, or the form of government in the eastern half that was forced upon them. And I think it just makes sense that instead of wondering what we're going to do with millions of refugees intent now upon getting out from under that system in East Germany, to once again say, "You who are Germans can stay in your homes and stay where you are, and it will be the Germany you once knew."

DONALDSON: I know you've often said that you don't believe your views have changed about the Soviet Union, but you recognize that the Soviet Union may, in some sense, particularly under Gorbachev, be changing. So I want to ask you about your famous phrase, "the evil empire," that you in 1983 spoke in Orlando, Florida, if memory serves. What do you think about it now?

PRESIDENT REAGAN: Well, I have to tell you, I said that on purpose. There were some things that I believed very deeply, from before the time that I came into office. I believed that the best peace is peace through strength. And I believed also that the Soviet Union needed to know and to hear what we felt about them, so that, oh, maybe in some of the previous meetings that had been held in which they had — people tried to negotiate on a basis of just developing a friendship or something, that we were aware of what the Communist totalitarianism was like, and that we were realists.

DONALDSON: Well, aware, and in your case, certainly very confident that it would fall. I remember in London once, you talked about Communism eventually being consigned to the dustheap of history. Do you feel vindicated?

PRESIDENT REAGAN: Well, I have always believed that, and I think it will, and I think there's evidence in the world today. We see all over the Communist part of the world these great changes taking place, Hungary and in Poland, in the eastern bloc and so forth, and other countries that way, and we see a great wave of democracy sweeping the world. And I think what it is, is people have had time in some 70-odd years of — since the Communist revolution, I think the people have seen that Communism has had its chance and it doesn't work.

DONALDSON: President Reagan, you're looking well, we're glad to see it, and we thank you for joining us tonight.

PRESIDENT REAGAN: Well, thank you, Sam. It's a great pleasure to talk to you, and to talk to you under these circumstances, with this announcement that's just been made. If the Wall isn't torn down immediately, at least they could keep the gates open. Could I just finish with one thing? When I made that statement, with the Brandenburg Gate behind me, and I was talking to a great audience of West Germans, in that statement about the Wall, I had had an opportunity to look across the Wall. Now, the people in West Berlin had arranged the sound system so that my voice was carrying on both sides of the Wall. But I could see East German police keeping the East German people in the streets from getting anywhere near the Wall, to keep them from hearing, overhearing anything that we might be saying on the other side, on the west side of that Wall. So there was another sign of their system and how it worked with their own people. They just manhandled them and turned them around and would not let them, even though they were staying in East Germany, not let them come near the Wall.

DONALDSON: Thank you, President Reagan. Thank you very much, and give our best to your wife.

PRESIDENT REAGAN: I certainly will, and thank you, Sam.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Limbaugh: Obama Is A "Threat To Liberty"

Visit this Real Clear Politics link to see video of Rush Limbaugh addressing that Obama Is A "Threat To Liberty"

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Obama Under Oath: 5 Cases Left



From The Desk Of Gary G. Kreep
Dear Friend of the Constitution,



URGENT UPDATE: USJF IS INVOLVED IN EVERY CURRENTLY ACTIVE OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE

With the recent dismissal of the Kerchner case in New Jersey Federal District Court, the UNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATION (USJF) is now involved in every case currently active challenging whether Mr. Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States. With either financial support or the direct involvement of our legal team, USJF is leading the way to force Barack Obama to tell America the truth. With now 5 separate cases, where USJF is making the difference, your financial support is more critical than ever before.

Thanks to the support of 1,000's of Americans like yourself, the courts are rapidly moving forward towards our goal of getting Barack Obama under oath and forcing him to reveal the truth about the many documents that he has not provided America. The only cases that still have a chance to produce this result are the cases we are funding. We can only keep funding them with your support.

HELP US MAKE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PROVE WHETHER HE IS ELIGIBLE TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
CLICK HERE NOW!

Here is the current update on our most active case in California….

Barack Hussein Obama is not happy! When his taxpayer paid U. S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") attorneys walked into court on October 5, 2009, expecting United States Federal District Court Judge David Carter to immediately dismiss the birth certificate case, he did not get his way! After hearing hours of argument, Judge Carter "took the matter under submission." He has still not issued a ruling, 24 days later!

If Obama has the valid birth certificate, all the lawyers would have to do is submit it to the courts, and the case would be dismissed. Has he done that? NO!

According to the DOJ Attorneys: The President is above the Law and the Courts!

The DOJ attorneys told the Judge that no Court in the United States had the right to rule on whether Barack Hussein Obama was eligible to serve as President of the United States! In their view, he could only be impeached and/or disqualified from the Office of President under the 25th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution.

THIS IS NOT TRUE! As USJF pointed out to the Court, both in our pleadings and in our oral presentation at the hearing, both the impeachment statutes, and the 25th Amendment require a sitting President. However, if Mr. Obama is not eligible to serve as President, he could not be, and never was, a sitting President, so those options for removal could not apply. Therefore the courts would have jurisdiction.

HELP US MAKE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PROVE WHETHER HE IS ELIGIBLE TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
CLICK HERE NOW!

Monday, October 5, 2009, at 8:30 a.m., in California, was a critical milestone for our entire legal and public relations effort to force Barack Obama to produce his birth certificate, as well as other documents, to prove whether he is eligible to serve as President of the United States. And with your support USJF was able to be there to argue the case.

This case has an excellent chance to survive the Department of Justice motion to dismiss, and it has proven to be the best chance for America to have a hearing on the merits on this critical Constitutional issue.

What happened that day in Court? It's very simple—the DOJ attorneys brought up every argument that they could to try to persuade the Court to dismiss this case

Fortunately, USJF provided sound legal arguments against all of the DOJ legal theories, and we were the only ones to do so; otherwise the whole case could have been over right then and there! According to observers at the hearing, the USJF oral arguments may well be the difference between this case surviving or being dismissed.

The Judge raised issues critical to our case:

1. Did U.S. Senators question the eligibility of Mr. Obama? (Only USJF was able to tell the Court that Senators Coburn and Shelby and a number of House of Representative members had done so.)

2. Were objections made by Members of Congress when the vote of the Electoral College was certified? (Only USJF was able to tell the Court that NO, then Vice-President Cheney had not performed his required duty of asking for objections, so there could have been none raised.)

DOJ attorneys also argued that only Congress, and/or the Electoral College, could decide on the eligibility of Mr. Obama. Fortunately, the USJF legal team, and only the USJF legal team, filed pleadings pointing out that the DOJ legal arguments in this regard WERE WRONG! And, I was there to argue against those false claims.

People at the hearing and those who have found out what happened there since have been contacting USJF, thanking us for standing up for the truth!

But the fight is not over yet! We expect a ruling from the Court any day now. If we defeat the dismissal motion, then we're immediately filing pleadings ("discovery") seeking Mr. Obama's birth certificate, his college records, and much, much more. AND, we'll be seeking to depose Mr. Obama ASAP!

And if the Court grants the motion to dismiss, we'll be immediately filing an appeal of the decision!

But we can only do this if we have your financial support!

Judge Carter has finally set a trial date in this case. To keep that date, we need to defeat the DOJ dismissal motion, and then, IMMEDIATELY, move right into the discovery phase discussed above. BUT THAT WILL BE VERY EXPENSIVE, AS WE WILL NEED TO:

  • Retain attorneys in Washington, D. C., to take Mr. Obama's deposition.
  • Retain attorneys in Hawaii to take the deposition of those in control of the Obama birth records and school records.
  • Take the deposition of Occidental, College officials to obtain Obama school records
  • Retain attorneys in Massachusetts to take the deposition of Harvard Law School officials to obtain Mr. Obama's school records there.
  • Pay the cost of the court reporters for all of these depositions. Plus,
  • Pay the cost of serving the subpoenas on the various witnesses.


HELP US MAKE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PROVE WHETHER HE IS ELIGIBLE TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: CLICK HERE NOW!
We expect the DOJ, as well as Mr. Obama's private attorneys, to fight us every step of the way! We beleive that Mr. Obama's attorneys will file motions to block the depositions in each and every state, and in the District of Columbia, trying to prevent us from obtaining the truth at every turn ! AND, WE WILL NEED MORE HELP TO:
  • Investigate the issue of the passport files of Mr. Obama! We're going after the records of how he traveled abroad without a United States Passport in the 1980's, as he admits doing.
  • Investigate the issue of his alleged adoption by his step-father in Indonesia! We'll be seeking records about that also!
  • Resolve questions about his Selective Service files! We'll be seeking records concerning that also!
But, first, we have to get past the DOJ dismissal motion! The DOJ's motion to dismiss also claims that our clients have no "standing," and that the matter is "political." But, if we as citizens of the United States have no "standing" to verify the citizenship of the man occupying the White House, who does? If our Federal Courts have no jurisdiction to hear this case, who does? It's not a "political" question, it's a CONSTITUTIONAL question! Last November, people said we were crazy to pursue this issue. Now, we've been shown to be right in our pursuit of the truth. It's not just the original birth certificate that they're refusing to release. Barack Obama's legal team has spent, according to published reports, over $1.4 million dollars so far to STOP anyone from seeing ANY of his actual identification documents, and many other documents. WHAT is Barack Obama trying to hide? WHAT is he afraid of? WHY doesn't he just release these documents to prove whether he is a natural-born citizen and therefore qualified serve as President -- especially his actual birth certificate? When Barack Obama officially entered the office of President, he became, in essence, apparently, a "pretender to the throne." According to the Constitution, only a "natural born citizen" can occupy the presidency. Even though he was sworn in on January 20, 2009, Barack Obama is NOT legally the President of the United States, unless he can prove that he is a "natural born citizen." What's more, every action taken by him while he occupies the White House may be invalid. If he cannot legally be President, every law passed by Congress will be null and void because the Constitution clearly requires that all laws be signed by the President... and, without a legally elected and sworn in President in office, that becomes an impossibility. This Constitutional crisis must be ended! And it must be ended NOW!

HELP US MAKE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PROVE WHETHER HE IS ELIGIBLE TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: CLICK HERE NOW!
And that's just what we're fighting to do. The United States Justice Foundation is spearheading a campaign to protect the United States Constitution... and your liberty. We have to press our case to stop Barack Obama from, apparently, illegally holding the Presidency, despite the ongoing threats against us. We are in the process of filing additional lawsuits and administrative actions, over and above those already filed, if you will help us today. Are you willing to see the Constitution shredded by the Left? Will you sit back and do nothing while a foreign-born person may be illegally occupying the White House as President of the United States? Our country is on the fast track to disaster... but you can help us keep the situation from getting worse. I pray that I'll hear from you today. Sincerely, Gary Kreep, Executive Director United States Justice Foundation P.S. This is the biggest political cover-up in American history! It would be so simple to release the documents to PROVE Obama is a natural-born citizen… IF THEY HAD THE DOCUMENTS! America has never before faced such a threat. Everything we hold dear is at risk with Barack Obama sitting as President without him releasing his actual birth certificate, plus the dozens of other documents that he refuses to produce. Please remember that we are also fighting in the California Appellate Court system on this same issue. And we are also working on legal strategies to challenge many of the laws that Barack Obama has signed into law. Barack Hussein Obama thinks he can get away with DUPING the American people and DESTROYING the U.S. Constitution. DON'T LET HIM DO IT!
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a non-profit organization, whose tax-exempt status under IRS section 501(c)(3) has been recognized by the Internal Revenue Service. Your contributions are tax deductible. Corporate contributions may be accepted.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Thought Control Passes

By Eugene Delgaudio, President, Public Advocate of the United States: Despite their best efforts, pro-family forces were not able to overcome the pro-homosexual backroom deal in the Senate, losing the vote on Thought Control 68-29 with 10 Republicans voting in favor of Thought Control. This vote is indicative of the dramatic turn Congress has taken since the last election.

In past years, Public Advocate was able to force the removal of Thought Control from the Defense Authorization Act. But with Harry Reid in full control of Congress, there is little pro-family forces can do to stop them without your strong and immediate support.

Not only does this bill create a special class of citizens, it comes attached to a bill designed to equip our soldiers. Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) gave a strong speech against the morality of this bill.

Here is an excerpt from Senator Jim DeMint's speech regarding the Thought Control bill: "It is very cynical that this bill that funds our soldiers, who are fighting for our Constitution and our country, actually undermines the very principles that they are fighting for." To watch his speech against Thought Control, please click here.

"It is an outrage," said Public Advocate President Eugene Delgaudio, "I can't believe so many Senators -- including 10 Republicans -- bent to the underhanded tactics of the Homosexual Lobby."

Here is the list of Republican Senators who voted for Thought Control:
  • Sen. Christopher Bond [R - MO]: (202) 224-5721
  • Sen. Susan Collins [R - ME]: (202) 224-2523
  • Sen. John Cornyn [R - TX]: (202) 224-2934
  • Sen. John Ensign [R - NV]: (202) 224-6244
  • Sen. Judd Gregg [R - NH]: (202) 224-3324
  • Sen. Kay Hutchison [R - TX]: (202) 224-5922
  • Sen. Richard Lugar [R - IN]: (202) 224-4814
  • Sen. John McCain [R - AZ]: (202) 224-2235
  • Sen. Olympia Snowe [R - ME]: (202) 224-5344
  • Sen. George Voinovich [R - OH]: (202) 224-3353
"A special class of citizens has just been created in our own nation. Public Advocate and our supporters must redouble our efforts to prevent this from leading to the passage of the rest of the Homosexual Agenda," concluded Mr. Delgaudio.

The Defense Authorization Act will now go to Obama for his signature. Please give the White House a call at 202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414 and leave a message asking President Obama to veto the Defense Authorization Act containing the Thought Control bill (S. 909).  It is important to remember that Thought Control is only the #2 piece of legislation on the Homosexual Lobby's radical agenda.

The Gay Bill of Special Rights is widely regarded as the most important component of their Radical Agenda.

Knowing this, Public Advocate and their pro-family supporters must increase the pressure on Congress and immediately mobilize millions more pro-family activists.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Barry and Fox News

PL Booth, The Blue Eye View: So, the President has declared war against a particular news outlet because it has a "particular point of view."

DUH! They all do. It's just that Fox doesn't share the Liberal (Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive, whatever) point-of-view but tends to be more neutral on more subjects than the other big three MSM networks actually having the chutzpah to disagree with the "Anointed One" over such things as health care, ACORN, and his Czars (advisors). I guess Foxes don't make good lap-dogs.

Maybe the reason Fox Network News viewer ratings have so rapidly overtaken the others is because the American Public is damned tired of being lied to and actually prefers to make up its own mind rather being told what to think.
Having connected the dots, we know that Mr's. Jones, Dunn, & Sunstein (Czars) et al actually were properly vetted. It's not that Obama's not familiar enough with their viewpoints; it's that he is. These people weren't chosen despite their views; they were chosen precisely because their views coincide with Obama's. If it walks like a communist, talks like a communist, and espouses state control in the name of "the people" like a communist, it's a communist. The MSM has yet to notice this fact.

However, in February of this year, Newsweek giddily proclaimed, "We are all socialists now!" Obama is no mere socialist. Socialists just want your money; communists want complete control of your life. The present Healthcare scheme will extend Federal Control over 60% of the US economy. It is funny that the MSM deny the Congressional Budget Office figures and conclusions but Fox doesn't.

Obama nationalized banks and car companies, fired the CEO of a major corporation, appointed ministers unaccountable to anyone but himself to set salaries for executives in private industry, castigated and threatened secured bondholders and ran roughshod over their contract rights in favor of political patronage, spent nearly a trillion dollars in "stimulus" legislation that was loaded with Democrap pork, proposed "cap-and-trade" legislation that will confiscate American wealth and transfer it to third world nations (many of whom are run by leftist dictators.) His 'pièce de résistance' is merely a government takeover of the entire health care industry in the United States, the legislative crowbar by which government will be forced into every aspect of our lives from birth to death.

All, BO has accomplished by deceit, trumped up indignation, and demonization of private enterprise and business leaders – classic Marxist propaganda. But that is not yet enough. Too many Americans oppose Obama's take over the American health care industry (54% according to the latest Rasmussen poll). Over 40% now "strongly disapprove" of Obama's performance as President. Hundreds of thousands have turned out at "tea parties," townhalls, and a march on Washington. Resistance is growing. And Fox News is reporting it! Of course the Marxists disapprove.

Obama knows Americans favor limited government, personal liberty, free market exchange, and individual responsibility. If we opt to get our news and commentary from outside the controlled press which cast him as "god" and pitch his statist agenda do adoringly, we might actually see what is happening to us. Every good communist knows a stranglehold on the media is required. BO has now launched a full-scale attack on Fox News and any other media refusing to toe his party line (the internet.)Obama's methodology is right out of the Marxist-Leninist playbook.

In the style of history's most talented dictators, Obama remains above the fray, having thugs, well-meaning but ignorant "social justice" Christians, leftist theorists, and political hacks make his arguments and do his dirty work for him. A good many of those constitute the MSM. Thank God at least some locally published papers are independent enough to avoid a total stranglehold.

And Thank God for such as Fox News and the Internet. I am very sure BO and his minions have secure plans to control the Internet, its contents, and any independent news or commentary sources just as quickly as they can snow the Liberal Democrats who share their agenda into allowing it.

There are still some who haven't yet reconciled Obama's admittedly leftist leanings with his reluctance to vocally support Iranian protestors, his shunning the Dalai Lama, his obsequious bow to the Saudi king, his embrace of Hugo Chavez, and his defense of ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya (whose disregard for the constraints of his own Honduran constitution was the reason for his ouster).
Anyone still struggling with the perceived inconsistency does not yet understand the differences between traditional liberalism and communism. Communists – like all utopian ideologues - are always, at their core, authoritarian. Professing to love and care for "the people" is a transparent cover for actual loathing of "the people" and complete disdain for individual choices, as Obama, his comrades in Congress, and his shills in the media have demonstrated toward Americans again and again. They consider representative government a farce and façade. It doesn't matter what you want; they know better than you and they should be in charge because they DO know better. Their modern moniker is "Progressive" but a commie by any other name is still a commie. A rose is a rose is a rose.

In times past, those accused of communist sympathies would deny it (because Communism was still a progenitor of the "Cold War"). Today's Marxists brazenly say, "Yes, we can!" Perhaps too many years have passed since we saw the last leftist barbarians starving, imprisoning, or slaughtering millions of their own people in fruitless pursuits of utopia. Remember, the press loved the Communist North Vietnamese and North Koreans in their days of conflict.

Perhaps Obama & Co. are being allowed to get away with this because our press views Obamunism as a "kinder, gentler" sort of progressivism than that responsible for the deaths of 100 million people in the past 90 years or so. Or perhaps people just cannot believe that a fatherless boy from a difficult background, a man willing to reveal all in heartfelt autobiographies (even if fiction), a gifted speaker inspiring such admiration – could possibly pose a threat to the (once) freest nation in the world.

This is foolhardy. The people Obama handpicked to advise him share his willful arrogance of human nature and sense of moral superiority. Those two traits, more than any others, power the "ends justify the means" ethos behind some of the very bloodiest excesses of human history. That same history is filled with examples where oppression was accompanied by inspiring tales of hardships overcome, ghost-written autobiographies, soaring rhetoric, and a population willing to enshrine their Leader as some godlike figure, witness NAZI Germany and Hitler.

Ultimately, the question should not be about Barack Obama the individual. He may be the kindest man one could hope to meet despite his Progressive Arrogance. The drafters of our Constitution understood something fundamental: the best protection against oppression lies in limited government, not the benevolent personality of whoever happens to be in office at the time. BO is no benevolent King.

Throwing away liberty simply because Obama seems like a basically decent guy is precisely what the Founding Fathers warned against. (And for the record, I personally place no confidence in a man who views our Constitution as "flawed," precisely because it limits his power.)

There were not very many who remarked with astonishment at a President whose inaugural address was themed around "remaking America" though some Fox Commentators DID! Millions wondered in breathless anticipation what this "remade" America could look like. Look at Obama's role models, and the role models of his appointees and political supporters, and you'll know. Obama's remade America would look like Cuba; North Korea; The former Soviet Union; Venezuela; Cambodia; Myanmar; China, and the Middle East.

"Communism" may be an outdated term. OK! Whatever you choose to call it – totalitarianism, authoritarianism, liberalism, progressivism, statism, libertarian paternalism – it is the same mindset. Like a virus, the change of name is merely a mutation of the same ideas threatening to destroy the body politic, even the idea of Liberty, itself. Never again vote for an incumbent Congressman.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Coulter: Natural-Born Losers

Love Ann Coulter's commentary and pointed banter. However, much of the banter was removed to highlight Coulter's important points. To enjoy the complete article with banter, her full article linked below. Photo provided by a reader. Seemed relevant to Ann's article and the present state of affairs. Thank you Ann Coulter and God Bless our troops including Commanding General Stanley McChrystal.
---------------
by Ann Coulter: The question of whether President Obama should send more troops to Afghanistan misses the point. . . . The most important part of warfare is picking your battlefield, and President Bush picked Iraq for a reason. Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan attacked us on 9/11 -- or the dozen other times American embassies, barracks and buildings came under jihadist onslaught since Jimmy Carter presided over "regime change" in Iran in 1979. Both countries -- and others -- gave succor to terrorists who had attacked the U.S. repeatedly, and would do so again.

As liberals endlessly reminded us during the three weeks of war in Afghanistan before the U.S. military swept into Kabul, Afghanistan has all the makings of a military disaster. It is mountainous, cave-pocked, tribal, has no resources worth fighting for and a populace that makes Khalid Sheikh Mohammed look like Alistair Cooke.

By contrast, Iraq had a relatively educated, pro-Western populace, but was ruled by a brutal third-world despot. . . . Not only could regime change in Iraq work, but Iraq's countryside was susceptible to America's overwhelming air power. Also, Iraq has fabulous natural resources. Once the U.S. got control of Iraq's oil fields, the Shia, Sunni and Kurds could decide to either prosper together or starve together. . . . By contrast, there aren't a lot of sticks that can be used in a wasteland like Afghanistan, where the people live in caves and scratch out a living in the dirt. . . .

But Democrats couldn't care less about military strategy . . . Liberals sneered at Bush's description of Iraq as the "central front of the war on terror" and a step toward the "democratization of the Middle East" . . . By design, Iraq was the central front in the war on terrorism. Any fanatic who hated the Great Satan, owned an overnight bag . . . was lured across the border into Iraq ... to be met by the awesome force of the U.S. military. Bush chose the battlefield that made the best flytrap for Islamic crazies and also that was most amenable to regime change.

Now nearly all denizens of the Middle East want the U.S. to invade them, so they can live in democracy, too. As Thomas Friedman inadvertently admitted, Lebanese voters credit their recent free election, in which the voters threw out Hezbollah, to President Bush. . . . Brave Iranian students who protested the tyrant Ahmadinejad did so because of Iraq -- and then they stopped because of Obama's indifference. Sadly for them, America's foreign policy will now be based on a calculus of political correctness, not national security.

During the campaign, Obama prattled on about Iraq being a "war of choice" and Afghanistan a "war of necessity" for no more thoughtful reason than a desire to win standing ovations from treasonous liberals. But lo and behold, those very liberals who were champing at the bit to fight in Afghanistan are suddenly full of objections to the war there, too. As Frank Rich points out: "Afghanistan is not Iraq. It is poorer, even larger and more populous, more fragmented and less historically susceptible to foreign intervention." . . .

Afghanistan is a brutal battlefield, largely invulnerable to modern warfare -- something the British and Russians learned. But as our military under Bush showed the world in 21 days, scimitar-wielding savages are no match for the voluntary civilian troops of a free people.

Bush removed the Taliban from power, captured or killed the lunatics and, for the next seven years, about the only news we heard out of Afghanistan were occasional announcements of parliamentary elections, new schools, water and electricity plants.

The difficult choice Obama faces in Afghanistan is entirely of his own making, not his generals' and certainly not Bush's. It was Obama's meaningless blather about Afghanistan being a "war of necessity" during the campaign that has moved the central front in the war on terrorism from Iraq -- a good battleground for the U.S. -- to Afghanistan -- a lousy battlefront for the U.S.

And it was Obama's idea to treat war as if it's an ordinary drug bust, reading suspects their Miranda rights and taking care not to put civilians in harm's way. A Democrat is president and, once again, America finds itself in an "unwinnable war." I know Democrats will never learn, but I wish the voters would. [Full Article]
ARRA News Service

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Patrick J. Michaels : Deafening Silence on Real Climate Change - Townhall.com

Having been a licensed weather observer for more than 20 years from 1975 to 2001 and having worked intimately with aviation weather, reporting, observing, and delivering that information to thousands of aviators over that time period, I am convinced Global Warming is a myth designed to allow political control of people and resources, nothing else. NASA satellite pictures and on the ground weather observations from Antarctica belie the myth. 200 years of scientific study of weather, trends and causes point to two recurring weather cycles corresponding to the minor 7 year and the major 22 (or 11) year cyclic of sunspots as being the best indicators of long term annual weather cycles. We are presently in a solar calm and those cause cooling conditions, a fact that will become increasingly apparent over the next few years. Anyone happen to notice the US has been unusually cool and moist this year; MO is about 10-12 inches over its normal annual rainfall average at present and the year is not yet over. Record rains have fallen throughout the W and Midwest for the past few years. Montana went through a considerable draught these past few years but snow has again begun to fall and accumulate just as it did in the early 80's. The Rocky Mountains have recorded record snowfalls in several areas during the past couple years and they have also been increasing. In 1978 there was a widely published study that said the US was descending into a new mini ice age that was expected to last 200-300 years or more. Add to those facts that CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas (heat capturing) and it's time to rid ourselves of some dumbass politicians incapable of discerning data. FACT: CO2 is used by every green living plant in the world. Fact 2: CO2 is pumped into commercial greenhouses to improve the growing conditions. Fact 3: the byproduct of plants is O2 (oxygen) taken from the CO2 used. If we really want to affect CO2 levels, plant and grow more green plants. The hoopla about Global Warming is about political power over people and resources, mainly our monies. Full Story

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Profiles in Courage II -- a Dr. Mike Adams Column

Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Profiles in Courage II by Mike Adams: In late October of 2004, I flew to Miami to go deer hunting for the weekend of my 40th birthday. Doug Giles picked me up at the airport. He greeted me with a Cuban cigar. When I told him I also liked Cuban food he decided to take me down to Little Havana for the evening. We decided to drop off my luggage on the way.

When we arrived at Doug's place I met his daughter Hannah. She was about 16 at the time. The first thing I noticed about her was an unusual pair of earrings she was wearing. They looked like the tusks off a wild hog. So, after we were formally introduced, I asked her the obvious question: "Umm, Hannah, are those wild hog tusks dangling from your ears?" That's when she told me she shot a hog with her 30-30, pulled his tusks, and made a pair of earrings.

Before we went to Little Havana we had to drop Hannah and her sister (not "sisters") off at their martial arts class. Doug and I probably see eye-to-eye (and hog tooth to hog tooth) on the issue of executing rapists. But it's far better to give your daughter a gun so she can kill a rapist in self-defense before a rape ever occurs. But if, heaven forbid, your daughter encounters a rapist in a gun-free zone – otherwise known as a college campus – she needs to learn how to flip him on his back and break his arm before he accomplishes his mission. And, who knows, maybe she can rip his molars out and make a nice pair of earrings.

Doug and I returned from our hunting trip mid-Saturday afternoon. I stayed over until Sunday so I could speak to his congregation. I talked about the assault on Christian values taking place on our campuses – and in our culture. I urged everyone to do something about it. And I hope I gave them some specific ideas.

There were a number of young people present. A few students came over from Miami University. And, of course, Hannah was there. I closed my speech as I often do with the story of the twelve spies of Israel and their chance to retake the Promised Land. I reminded everyone that Joshua and Caleb were surrounded by ten cowards afraid to reclaim the land. That is why the people wandered in the desert for forty years.

Whenever I'm speaking to young people I also argue that America has been wandering in the desert for about forty years (since the 1960s). And I argue that today – just as in the days of Joshua and Caleb – cowards outnumber the brave by a ratio of at least five to one. And the only way to change that is to go charging down the mountainside to reclaim the Promised Land hoping that one's example will become contagious.

Hannah Giles has certainly become one of those brave souls. She has become active in the conservative movement. And she seeks to put truth above partisan politics as she pursues a career as an investigative journalist. She first got involved in the Conservative Movement after attending the Young America's Foundation (see YAF.org) National Conservative Student Conference in Washington, D.C. in 2007. She attended that program in 2008, too. She also went to YAF's Enemies of Freedom Seminar at the incredible Reagan Ranch Center in Santa Barbara, California.

From there, she decided to intern at the National Journalism Center over the summer of 2009. It was during her internship that she decided to take on an insane and courageous project. And it was definitely not YAF's idea. It wasn't even her crazy father's idea. It was pure Hannah Giles.

Hannah, while she was jogging, decided it would be interesting to dress as a hooker and go into an ACORN office seeking help in furthering a prostitution ring. She got her friend James O'Keefe to play the role of a pimp and go in with her. In the end, they went into several ACORN offices to see whether ACORN would give them money, which comes from taxpayers, to further a criminal enterprise.

The sting worked like a charm. The pair caught ACORN – on film, mind you – giving advice on how to set up a prostitution ring and funnel money into a congressional campaign fund. ACORN workers were even willing to help with the money laundering scheme after they heard of their plan to bring under-aged sex slaves into the illegal enterprise.

Hannah and James went public with the tapes. They have been on national television shows and have almost completely destroyed ACORN's credibility. ACORN is no longer working on the U.S. Census. And they are on the verge of losing all government support in the form of taxpayer funding.

But, just like a wild hog after it has been shot, the pigs that run ACORN are fighting to the death. And, for a time, they will be more dangerous than ever before. They've sued Hannah Giles arguing that their rights to privacy have been violated. Their position is simple: "We at ACORN are the real victims. We have a right to unlimited taxpayer support. Our former lawyer, Barack Obama, is the President of the United States. We have a right to spend public money without fear of public exposure. We'll even conspire to allow your taxpayer dollars to fund child prostitution. And you will say nothing about it. Or else we will sue."

In other words, ACORN is trying to turn America into a third world nation. But you can stop them by helping to defend Hannah Giles. Contribute to her cause www.DefendHannah.com and, together, we can destroy ACORN permanently. And we can toss the carcasses of these swine upon the ash heap of history. And we can forever stop them from feeding at the government trough.

Hannah Giles has decided to run down the side of the mountain and reclaim the Promised Land. And now she needs our help. Will we wander in the desert? Or will we answer the call?

Make Mine freedom


[Video]

Monday, October 12, 2009

News Busted