Benghazi should have been the wakeup call for all Americans. We have an administration that refused to assist our own Ambassador because it might have hurt the re-elction chances of the great BungHole and Hillary as successor.
IRS Scandal
------
The IRS scandal is much more then a scandal. Your rights as citizens to participate in free and open elections of their representatives in congress and a popular vote for President of the United States. Though no one has the right to vote for president, only the electoral college does and it was
obviously influenced by the popular vote.
This means that illegitimate congressmen and president from the 2012 election are presiding over the government and what is and isn't being investigated. The white wash has begun and several attempts at placating the public have
already been made. The IRS abuse will not be corrected by the establishment types in either party, the president and his cronies in the regime have no interest in stopping what the IRS is doing and will likely accelerate their plans. No dramatic actions have been taken by congress, ie.. suspension of the entire agency and approval of all 501c applications already submitted. If dramatic actions aren't taken by congress by July 1 they never will be.
Where does this leave us, the people. In the same place we were in 1776, taxation without representation. Its the surest sign that the only way to restore this once great nation to the correct path is by taking up arms against this government. Others have said that when the ballot box no longer works its time to get worried, well its that time. We the people will have to take measures into our on hands.
This Blogger does not advocate the overthrow nor use of arms to correct our current disfunctional government but I do advocate the peaceful removal of this piece of trash in the WHitehouse now.
As you can see above, there are numerous people who say they are ready to take up arms now an dI publish this to show proofs they are becoming public.
Tags: Obama,whitehouse,arms,advocation,congress,IRS,benghazi To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Who in the Obama Administration is Going to Jail?
Who in the Obama Administration is Going to Jail?
I think this is a more than fair question. Even the FBI can't be held off forever and it seems too obvious that felonies have been committed, likely at the begest of BO officials in his WH staff. If it was BO directing (and his sycopphants decide they don't really want to do jail time for him) then it's most certainly impeachable offenses. The fact that Dem senators asked via letter to look into conservative groups does not legalize IRS conduct nor leaks of returns.
------
Who in the Obama Administration is Going to Jail?
It hasn’t been a very good week for the Obama administration. In fact, I’ve never seen the sharks circling as they are today… particularly about the IRS abuse scandal.
You see, Congress is serious about this one. They have five years of pent-up frustration over Obama’s Teflon-like ability to shirk responsibility, and now that he’s on the defensive they’re going to make sure the law is enforced. The Speaker of the House, John Boehner, asked, “Who’s going to jail over this scandal?”
Yet somehow Obama and his team seem to not understand the gravity of the charges leveled against them. Or perhaps they’re simply in denial. They’ve clearly lost control of the news cycle, and even Obama’s own people are starting to look out for themselves. (Just my opinion but I believe he is simply too arrogant to think he's vulnerable.)
Not even the most committed Obama followers want to do jail time for him. (Again debateable as there are many socialist true believers in the federal workforce)
The IRS Scandal in Review
So far, Mr. Boehner and the media have mostly focused on the delay/rejection of tax-exempt status for Tea Party and conservative advocacy groups.
We see this clearly in Boehner’s comments: “Someone made a conscious decision to harass and to hold up these requests for tax-exempt status… I think we need to know who they are and whether they violated the law. Clearly, someone violated the law.”
But my sources on Capitol Hill tell me the investigation has moved from this first violation onto even more significant breaches of IRS statute.
It seems that, under Obama, the IRS has leaked specific information from tax returns and IRS applications of conservative organizations to the media and liberal advocacy organizations.
We know this because of a report from the news organization, ProPublica, which received the illegal information. An article released on May 13 states:
“The same IRS office that deliberately targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 election released nine pending confidential applications of conservative groups to ProPublica
late last year.”
And if that wasn’t enough, House investigators have also heard about another major felony committed by someone at the IRS.
John Eastman, Chairman of the Board of the anti-same-sex-marriage group, The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), reported, “A year ago, someone at the IRS illegally disclosed the confidential portions of its tax return to
the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the leading organization on the other side of NOM in the war over the definition of marriage. At the time, HRC was headed by someone who had just been named national co-Chair of the Obama for President campaign.”
The bottom line is this: Releasing confidential tax returns is a felony, and the review of confidential tax returns is also a felony.
The HRC reviewed the illicit tax returns and, after acknowledging the document was illegally received, placed it on their website. Soon afterward, the information appeared on the Huffington Post and in other news outlets.
Eastman tried repeatedly to get the attention of authorities. He said:
“We asked the IRS and the Department of Justice for an investigation more than a year ago. An investigation was had, but they refuse to let us know who was responsible. We then filed several freedom of information act requests to
get to the truth, beginning last August. But NOM’s requests have largely been stonewalled. That latest non-response response is priceless. The identity of the perpetrator, the person responsible for illegally disclosing NOM’s tax returns, is ‘confidential’ information protected from
disclosure by the very same law that this individual violated.”
Big Problems
Despite their nonchalance, Obama’s team actually has more to worry about than just Congress. The FBI is also looking into the IRS’s criminal activities under the Obama administration.
Tags: scofflaws,criminals,indictment,jail time,illegal,democrat actions,IRS,scandal To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
I think this is a more than fair question. Even the FBI can't be held off forever and it seems too obvious that felonies have been committed, likely at the begest of BO officials in his WH staff. If it was BO directing (and his sycopphants decide they don't really want to do jail time for him) then it's most certainly impeachable offenses. The fact that Dem senators asked via letter to look into conservative groups does not legalize IRS conduct nor leaks of returns.
------
Who in the Obama Administration is Going to Jail?
It hasn’t been a very good week for the Obama administration. In fact, I’ve never seen the sharks circling as they are today… particularly about the IRS abuse scandal.
You see, Congress is serious about this one. They have five years of pent-up frustration over Obama’s Teflon-like ability to shirk responsibility, and now that he’s on the defensive they’re going to make sure the law is enforced. The Speaker of the House, John Boehner, asked, “Who’s going to jail over this scandal?”
Yet somehow Obama and his team seem to not understand the gravity of the charges leveled against them. Or perhaps they’re simply in denial. They’ve clearly lost control of the news cycle, and even Obama’s own people are starting to look out for themselves. (Just my opinion but I believe he is simply too arrogant to think he's vulnerable.)
Not even the most committed Obama followers want to do jail time for him. (Again debateable as there are many socialist true believers in the federal workforce)
The IRS Scandal in Review
So far, Mr. Boehner and the media have mostly focused on the delay/rejection of tax-exempt status for Tea Party and conservative advocacy groups.
We see this clearly in Boehner’s comments: “Someone made a conscious decision to harass and to hold up these requests for tax-exempt status… I think we need to know who they are and whether they violated the law. Clearly, someone violated the law.”
But my sources on Capitol Hill tell me the investigation has moved from this first violation onto even more significant breaches of IRS statute.
It seems that, under Obama, the IRS has leaked specific information from tax returns and IRS applications of conservative organizations to the media and liberal advocacy organizations.
We know this because of a report from the news organization, ProPublica, which received the illegal information. An article released on May 13 states:
“The same IRS office that deliberately targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 election released nine pending confidential applications of conservative groups to ProPublica
late last year.”
And if that wasn’t enough, House investigators have also heard about another major felony committed by someone at the IRS.
John Eastman, Chairman of the Board of the anti-same-sex-marriage group, The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), reported, “A year ago, someone at the IRS illegally disclosed the confidential portions of its tax return to
the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the leading organization on the other side of NOM in the war over the definition of marriage. At the time, HRC was headed by someone who had just been named national co-Chair of the Obama for President campaign.”
The bottom line is this: Releasing confidential tax returns is a felony, and the review of confidential tax returns is also a felony.
The HRC reviewed the illicit tax returns and, after acknowledging the document was illegally received, placed it on their website. Soon afterward, the information appeared on the Huffington Post and in other news outlets.
Eastman tried repeatedly to get the attention of authorities. He said:
“We asked the IRS and the Department of Justice for an investigation more than a year ago. An investigation was had, but they refuse to let us know who was responsible. We then filed several freedom of information act requests to
get to the truth, beginning last August. But NOM’s requests have largely been stonewalled. That latest non-response response is priceless. The identity of the perpetrator, the person responsible for illegally disclosing NOM’s tax returns, is ‘confidential’ information protected from
disclosure by the very same law that this individual violated.”
Big Problems
Despite their nonchalance, Obama’s team actually has more to worry about than just Congress. The FBI is also looking into the IRS’s criminal activities under the Obama administration.
Tags: scofflaws,criminals,indictment,jail time,illegal,democrat actions,IRS,scandal To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Thursday, May 16, 2013
The enemy is the United States of America and everyone who supports it.
Truth writ large. Pay attention, especially if you have children in colleges. There are very few schools that are not teaching socialism and hatred of america, even high schools and our teachers who are actually aware of it can't seem to do anything about it, either. Results, ignoramuses that hate america or just plain think we are evil.
Brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who are accused of setting the bombs that exploded at the Boston Marathon, attended the University of Massachusetts. Maybe they hated our nation before college, but if you want lessons on hating America, college attendance might be a good start. Let's look at it.
"We need to think very, very clearly about who the enemy is. The enemy is the United States of America and everyone who supports it." That's taught to University of Hawaii students by Professor Haunani-Kay Trask. Richard Falk, professor emeritus at Princeton University and the U.N. Human Rights Council's Palestine monitor, explained the Boston bombings by saying, "The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world." Professor Falk has also stated that President George W. Bush ordered the destruction of the twin towers.
University of Southern California professor Darry Sragow preaches hate to his students in his regulation of elections and political finance class, recently telling them that Republicans are stupid, racist losers and that they are angry old white people. A few years ago, Rod Swanson, a UCLA economics professor, told his class, "The United States of America, backed by facts, is the greediest and most selfish country in the world." Penn State University professor Matt Jordan compared supporters of the voter ID laws to the Ku Klux Klan. Professor Sharon Sweet, an algebra teacher at Brevard Community College, told her students to sign a pledge that read, "I pledge to vote for President Obama and Democrats up and down the ticket." Fortunately, the college's trustees fired her.
University of Rhode Island history professor Erik Loomis tweeted, "I want (National Rifle Association executive vice president) Wayne LaPierre's head on a stick." He asked, "Can (we) define NRA membership as dues contributing to a terrorist organization?" Here's a sample of how Professor Loomis frequently expresses himself: "Motherf---ing f---heads f---ing f---." Then there's Georgetown law professor Louis Michael Seidman, who explained our national problems by saying, "But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions." Professor Seidman worked for The Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia. When he was sworn in as an officer of the court, I wonder what constitution he swore to uphold and defend.
Parents don't have to wait for college admission for their youngsters to receive America-hating lessons. Scott Compton, an English teacher at Chapin High School in Chapin, S.C., was put on administrative leave after he allegedly threw an American flag on the floor and stomped on it in front of his students. He has chosen to resign.
An Advanced Placement world geography teacher at Lumberton High School in Texas encouraged students to dress in Islamic clothing and instructed them to refer to the 9/11 hijackers not as terrorists but as "freedom fighters." They were also told to stop referring to the Holocaust as genocide. John Valastro, the superintendent of the Lumberton Independent School District, told Fox News that the teacher did absolutely nothing wrong.
In McAllen, Texas, teachers tried to force a teenager to sing the Mexican national anthem and recite Mexico's pledge of allegiance. The teen refused, saying it was against her beliefs as an American. She was thrown out of the class and given a failing grade for that day's assignment. Her father has filed a lawsuit on behalf of his daughter against the McAllen Independent School District.
Investor's Business Daily ran a story that shows student indoctrination is official union policy: "A New Low From The California Federation Of Teachers: Urine Indoctrination" (12/5/12). The union's website has a cartoon narrated by leftist Hollywood actor Ed Asner. In tones used when reading to children, Asner says: "(Rich people) love their money more than anything in the whole world. ... Over time, rich people decided they weren't rich enough, so they came up with ways to get richer." The cartoon finishes its class warfare message by graphically depicting "the rich" urinating on the poor.
These people running our education system are destroying the minds and values of our young people, and we allow them to do it.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM
Tags: ignorance,hatred,america,universities,colleges,false teachings,socialist views,progressives teachers To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who are accused of setting the bombs that exploded at the Boston Marathon, attended the University of Massachusetts. Maybe they hated our nation before college, but if you want lessons on hating America, college attendance might be a good start. Let's look at it.
"We need to think very, very clearly about who the enemy is. The enemy is the United States of America and everyone who supports it." That's taught to University of Hawaii students by Professor Haunani-Kay Trask. Richard Falk, professor emeritus at Princeton University and the U.N. Human Rights Council's Palestine monitor, explained the Boston bombings by saying, "The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world." Professor Falk has also stated that President George W. Bush ordered the destruction of the twin towers.
University of Southern California professor Darry Sragow preaches hate to his students in his regulation of elections and political finance class, recently telling them that Republicans are stupid, racist losers and that they are angry old white people. A few years ago, Rod Swanson, a UCLA economics professor, told his class, "The United States of America, backed by facts, is the greediest and most selfish country in the world." Penn State University professor Matt Jordan compared supporters of the voter ID laws to the Ku Klux Klan. Professor Sharon Sweet, an algebra teacher at Brevard Community College, told her students to sign a pledge that read, "I pledge to vote for President Obama and Democrats up and down the ticket." Fortunately, the college's trustees fired her.
University of Rhode Island history professor Erik Loomis tweeted, "I want (National Rifle Association executive vice president) Wayne LaPierre's head on a stick." He asked, "Can (we) define NRA membership as dues contributing to a terrorist organization?" Here's a sample of how Professor Loomis frequently expresses himself: "Motherf---ing f---heads f---ing f---." Then there's Georgetown law professor Louis Michael Seidman, who explained our national problems by saying, "But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions." Professor Seidman worked for The Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia. When he was sworn in as an officer of the court, I wonder what constitution he swore to uphold and defend.
Parents don't have to wait for college admission for their youngsters to receive America-hating lessons. Scott Compton, an English teacher at Chapin High School in Chapin, S.C., was put on administrative leave after he allegedly threw an American flag on the floor and stomped on it in front of his students. He has chosen to resign.
An Advanced Placement world geography teacher at Lumberton High School in Texas encouraged students to dress in Islamic clothing and instructed them to refer to the 9/11 hijackers not as terrorists but as "freedom fighters." They were also told to stop referring to the Holocaust as genocide. John Valastro, the superintendent of the Lumberton Independent School District, told Fox News that the teacher did absolutely nothing wrong.
In McAllen, Texas, teachers tried to force a teenager to sing the Mexican national anthem and recite Mexico's pledge of allegiance. The teen refused, saying it was against her beliefs as an American. She was thrown out of the class and given a failing grade for that day's assignment. Her father has filed a lawsuit on behalf of his daughter against the McAllen Independent School District.
Investor's Business Daily ran a story that shows student indoctrination is official union policy: "A New Low From The California Federation Of Teachers: Urine Indoctrination" (12/5/12). The union's website has a cartoon narrated by leftist Hollywood actor Ed Asner. In tones used when reading to children, Asner says: "(Rich people) love their money more than anything in the whole world. ... Over time, rich people decided they weren't rich enough, so they came up with ways to get richer." The cartoon finishes its class warfare message by graphically depicting "the rich" urinating on the poor.
These people running our education system are destroying the minds and values of our young people, and we allow them to do it.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM
Tags: ignorance,hatred,america,universities,colleges,false teachings,socialist views,progressives teachers To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Senate Dems to blame for IRS scandal
------
http://thehill.com/video/in-the-news/299... [1]
Former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove said Tuesday that Senate Democrats
should share the blame for the scandal over Internal Revenue Service agents
targeting conservative political groups.
Rove pointed to a 2012 letter signed by seven Democratic lawmakers, including
Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) that requested the IRS
"immediately change the administrative framework for enforcement of the tax
code as it applies to groups designated as 'social welfare' organizations."
Rove told Fox News that the staffers at the IRS accused of political
targeting "were doing what people on Capitol Hill wanted them to do."
“In 2010, Max Baucus … wrote a letter to the director of the IRS saying,
‘go investigate these kinds of groups.’ We had Chuck Schumer, who has
been stirring this around for a number of years, by 2012 he goes out and
gives a similar tough letter to the head of the IRS saying, ‘Look at these
groups,’ and gets six others to sign the letter,” Rove said.
The letter, obtained by ABC News, warns of "abuse of the tax code by
political groups focused on federal election activities."
Rove suggested Tuesday that the letter may have spurred the political
targeting.
“Maybe the low-level bureaucrats aren’t so low level and maybe they were
influenced by Democrats in the Congress saying take on these groups or else
you will face the consequences in front of us," he said.
A report from the Treasury Department's inspector general that was leaked
Monday revealed that the misbehavior began as early as 2010, and found that
it was driven by "ineffective management" rather than outside political
forces.
President Obama said in a statement Tuesday night that the actions were
"intolerable and inexcusable" and vowed accountability for the employees
involved.
"I’ve directed Secretary Lew to hold those responsible for these failures
accountable, and to make sure that each of the Inspector General’s
recommendations are implemented quickly, so that such conduct never happens
again," Obama said. "But regardless of how this conduct was allowed to take
place, the bottom line is, it was wrong.”
=========================
ACTUAL LETTER SENT TO IRS
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM176_10... [2]
Tags: democrats,senators,irs,monitoring,IG,wrong,illegal,documentation, democrat letter To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
------
http://thehill.com/video/in-the-news/299... [1]
Former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove said Tuesday that Senate Democrats
should share the blame for the scandal over Internal Revenue Service agents
targeting conservative political groups.
Rove pointed to a 2012 letter signed by seven Democratic lawmakers, including
Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) that requested the IRS
"immediately change the administrative framework for enforcement of the tax
code as it applies to groups designated as 'social welfare' organizations."
Rove told Fox News that the staffers at the IRS accused of political
targeting "were doing what people on Capitol Hill wanted them to do."
“In 2010, Max Baucus … wrote a letter to the director of the IRS saying,
‘go investigate these kinds of groups.’ We had Chuck Schumer, who has
been stirring this around for a number of years, by 2012 he goes out and
gives a similar tough letter to the head of the IRS saying, ‘Look at these
groups,’ and gets six others to sign the letter,” Rove said.
The letter, obtained by ABC News, warns of "abuse of the tax code by
political groups focused on federal election activities."
Rove suggested Tuesday that the letter may have spurred the political
targeting.
“Maybe the low-level bureaucrats aren’t so low level and maybe they were
influenced by Democrats in the Congress saying take on these groups or else
you will face the consequences in front of us," he said.
A report from the Treasury Department's inspector general that was leaked
Monday revealed that the misbehavior began as early as 2010, and found that
it was driven by "ineffective management" rather than outside political
forces.
President Obama said in a statement Tuesday night that the actions were
"intolerable and inexcusable" and vowed accountability for the employees
involved.
"I’ve directed Secretary Lew to hold those responsible for these failures
accountable, and to make sure that each of the Inspector General’s
recommendations are implemented quickly, so that such conduct never happens
again," Obama said. "But regardless of how this conduct was allowed to take
place, the bottom line is, it was wrong.”
=========================
ACTUAL LETTER SENT TO IRS
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM176_10... [2]
Tags: democrats,senators,irs,monitoring,IG,wrong,illegal,documentation, democrat letter To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
President Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden three times
before saying yes, because he got cold feet about the possible political harm
to himself if the mission failed. Instead of listening to advisors from the
U.S. military, Defense, or even State, Obama was acting on the advice of
White House politico and close friend Valerie Jarrett. Valerie Jarrett?
This account comes from Richard Miniter's upcoming book Leading From Behind:
The Reluctant President and the Advisors who Decide for Him. Miniter has
written a half-dozen books on the war on terror. He is relying on an unnamed
source within the U.S. military Joint Special Operations Command who was
directly involved in the operation and planning of the Osama bin Laden kill
mission.
Is the story credible? According to Edward Klein, a reporter once asked Obama
if he ran every decision by Jarrett. Obama answered, "Yep. Absolutely."
Edward Klein, former foreign editor of Newsweek and editor of the New York
Times Magazine for many years, describes Jarrett as "ground zero in the Obama
operation, the first couple's friend and consigliere." Klein -- who claims he
used a minimum of two sources for each assertion in his book on the Obama
presidency, The Amateur -- writes in detail about Jarrett opposing the raid
on bin Laden. She told Obama not to take the political risk. Klein thought
Obama ignored Jarrett's advice. Miniter tells us he listened to her, three
times telling Special Operations not to take the risk to go after bin Laden.
We need to understand the role Valerie Jarrett plays in Obama's private and
political life.
"If it wasn't for Valerie Jarrett, there'd be no Barack Obama to complain
about," starts Klein's chapter on Jarrett. He quotes Michelle Obama on
Jarrett's influence over her husband: "She knows the buttons, the soft spots,
the history, the context."
No one outside Michelle has the access or power over Obama's decision-making
like Jarrett does. Here's an odd little fact that gives some insight into
what kind of president Obama is: Michelle, Michelle's mother, and Valerie,
and only a few others in Washington, are allowed to call Barack by his first
name. After work, Jarrett joins Obama at night in the Family Quarters, where
she dines often with the First Family. She goes on vacation with them.
Jarrett's title is the weird mouthful "Assistant to the President for Public
Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs." She is the gatekeeper, but she is
also much more than that. She occupies Karl Rove's and Hillary's old office
and has an all-access pass to meetings. She shows up at the National Security
Council, at meetings on the economy and budget. She stays behind to advise
Obama on what to think and do. Obama uses her as his left-wing conscience.
Klein's sources describe how at each pressing issue, Obama turns to ask her,
"What do you think the right thing to do is?" As president, he likes to have
her next to him "as the voice of authentic blackness in a White House that is
staffed largely by whites."
A longtime friend told Klein that Jarrett is the "eyes, ears and nose" of the
Obamas. She tells them whom to trust, who is saying what, whom to see at home
and abroad. Michelle wants her there: "I told her ... it would give me a
sense of comfort to know that (Barack) had somebody like her there by his
side." As Obama told the New York Times, "Valerie is one of my oldest
friends. ... I trust her completely."
To understand why Obama relies so heavily on Jarrett, we must remember the
president's identity crisis as a black man, which is the main subject of his
memoir, Dreams from My Father. Valerie Jarrett's adoption of the Obamas as
her friends and protégés in Chicago's upper-crust black society was one of
the greatest things that ever happened to Obama. Until becoming a community
organizer, Obama tells us he felt himself to be an inauthentic American
black. Nothing in his life helped him understand or fit into the American
black community.
Within a few weeks of Obama's birth, conceived out of wedlock as he was, his
mother moved away to a different college, leaving Obama's African birth
father behind in Honolulu. There may have been a shotgun wedding or not -- in
the memoir, Obama says he is not sure. The only time Barack set eyes on his
father was a brief visit when he was ten. Our president lived with his white
mother, then with her and her Indonesian husband in Indonesia from age six to
ten. He was so unhappy that he chose to leave his mother and live with his
white grandparents back in America. Obama's America was the tolerant, wealthy
American world of Honolulu's top prep school.
His only black experience was his grandfather's creepy old friend, Frank
Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Communist and self-disclosed pederast, who
was Obama's voice of authentic blackness. One result of this lonely and
unhappy childhood as a mixed-race child was Barack Obama's envy problem. The
key to understanding Jarrett's power over the president is that Obama didn't
just envy people with normal parents and loving, successful fathers. He
envied American blacks, especially those who grew up in intact black
families, knowing who they were, comfortable in their black skin.
Valerie Jarrett reflects Obama in many ways. Like himself, Valerie looks more
white than black. Her mother had three white grandparents, and her father was
black. Like Obama, she lived in the Muslim world for part of her childhood,
when her father practiced medicine in Iran. Like Obama, she is a committed
leftist. But there are crucial differences. Her father was not a drunk Kenyan
polygamist like Obama's, but a famous pathologist and geneticist. Her mother
was not a leftist expatriate like Obama's, but a distinguished psychologist.
Valerie married into Chicago's black elite, the top rung of African-American
society. She went to Stanford, got a law degree from Michigan, and became
Mayor Richard Daley's deputy chief of staff, "the public black face" of his
administration.
When Valerie Jarrett hired Michelle to work for Daley and befriended her, the
Obamas gained access to the exclusive world of upper-class black Chicago
politics. Valerie knew everyone whom it was important to know in black and
Jewish money circles. She gave Barack entrée and legitimacy. She financed
and promoted his ambitions for national office.
Obama finally belonged. Not that Jarrett's record in Chicago was anything to
be proud of. Jarrett was known for her corruption and incompetence. Daley
finally had to fire her after a scandal erupted over her role in misuse of
public funds in the city's substandard public housing. She went on to become
CEO of Habitat Executive Services, pulling down $300,000 in salary and
$550,000 in deferred compensation. Again, she managed a housing complex that
was seized by government inspectors for slum conditions. The scandal didn't
matter to Obama. The sordid corruption was all part of Jarrett's Chicago
success story.
Every insider in Chicago told Klein the same thing: Jarrett has no
qualifications to be the principal advisor to the president of the United
States. She doesn't understand how Washington works, how relations with
Congress work, how the federal process works. She doesn't understand how the
economy works, how the military works, how national security works. But she
understands how Obama works.
The president turns to Valerie Jarrett for definitive advice on all these
issues. She has given him terrible advice over and over, and still he turns
to her.
Her true job is to make Obama feel proud of himself. When Obama looks at
Jarrett, he sees himself as whole and good and real. He is no longer the fake
black, the fatherless kid flailing around in a white world, tortured by the
unfairness of it all. She fills the emptiness at the core of his identity.
She admires and adores him. Jarrett told New Yorker editor David Remnick that
the president is "just too talented to do what ordinary people do." And the
icing on the cake -- she shares his left-wing politics that project
unfairness out onto white America.
Obama relies on Jarrett to create the White House bubble he likes to live in,
where his narcissism is stroked and his desire to do the big, left-wing thing
is encouraged. Jarrett is the doorman. She runs access to the president. As
Klein puts it, she guards him from meeting with "critics and complainers who
might deflate his ego." No one gets past Jarrett who has an incompatible
point of view.
Jarrett pushed ObamaCare. At the beginning of Obama's presidency, there was
pressure on Obama to focus on the economic crisis. Rahm Emanuel advised a
small, bipartisan health care reform with popular items such as coverage for
young adults -- to get it passed quickly and focus on the country's money
problems. Jarrett urged the president to be true to his left-wing agenda. She
was all for having Reid-Pelosi create the ObamaCare assault on the American
health system and ramming it through on a one-party vote, using Chicago-style
politics, while Obama crossed the country doing what he does best: make
speeches. Obama liked Jarrett's idea. Emanuel is now out of the White House.
Jarrett pushed the Solyndra fiasco. Jarrett promoted Solyndra because one of
her richest Chicago connections, billionaire George Kaiser, a top Obama
bundler, had a 35% share in Solyndra. Kaiser visited the White House sixteen
times.
Larry Summers, the director of the president's National Economic Council,
warned Obama that the federal government should not get involved in venture
capital of any sort. Summers understood that crony capitalism sabotages
economic growth. Huge government funding distorts and destroys whatever
market segment it touches, replacing economic decisions with political ones.
A member of Obama's finance committee warned the president that Solyndra was
going bankrupt. But it is Obama and Valerie who see eye to eye, and they saw
the value to Obama of rewarding his political cronies. It worked fine in
Chicago. Larry Summers is now out of the White House.
Jarrett pushed Obama to take on the Catholic Church over contraception,
arguing that it would appeal to single women (she was right) and that
religious freedom isn't important (she was wrong). Bill Daley, who had
replaced Rahm Emmanuel as chief of staff, argued against Obama pushing
contraception on the Church and invited Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan of
New York to meet with a displeased Obama, who didn't appreciate hearing from
the Church. Daley is now out of the White House.
Valerie Jarrett is the most powerful woman in Washington. She has guided the
president's decisions on health care, the budget, the stimulus, the deficit,
foreign affairs.
So when Jarrett told Obama that the mission to kill bin Laden was too
politically risky, and to play it safe, it is entirely plausible to believe
that the president listened to her. It is consistent with everything we know
about Obama's dependence on her. According to Miniter's source in the U.S.
Military Joint Special Operations Command, Obama listened to her for four
months, dithering and deciding no the first three times the military told him
that the time to get bin Laden was now.
In The Amateur, Klein reports that another worry won out. Obama was even more
scared of the political fallout if voters learned he'd passed up the chance
to get bin Laden. What decided him wasn't the national interest, but
politics. For once, the president disagreed with Valerie Jarrett
[1]
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/obamas_strange_dependence_on_valerie_jarrett.html
Tags: INSERT TAGS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
before saying yes, because he got cold feet about the possible political harm
to himself if the mission failed. Instead of listening to advisors from the
U.S. military, Defense, or even State, Obama was acting on the advice of
White House politico and close friend Valerie Jarrett. Valerie Jarrett?
This account comes from Richard Miniter's upcoming book Leading From Behind:
The Reluctant President and the Advisors who Decide for Him. Miniter has
written a half-dozen books on the war on terror. He is relying on an unnamed
source within the U.S. military Joint Special Operations Command who was
directly involved in the operation and planning of the Osama bin Laden kill
mission.
Is the story credible? According to Edward Klein, a reporter once asked Obama
if he ran every decision by Jarrett. Obama answered, "Yep. Absolutely."
Edward Klein, former foreign editor of Newsweek and editor of the New York
Times Magazine for many years, describes Jarrett as "ground zero in the Obama
operation, the first couple's friend and consigliere." Klein -- who claims he
used a minimum of two sources for each assertion in his book on the Obama
presidency, The Amateur -- writes in detail about Jarrett opposing the raid
on bin Laden. She told Obama not to take the political risk. Klein thought
Obama ignored Jarrett's advice. Miniter tells us he listened to her, three
times telling Special Operations not to take the risk to go after bin Laden.
We need to understand the role Valerie Jarrett plays in Obama's private and
political life.
"If it wasn't for Valerie Jarrett, there'd be no Barack Obama to complain
about," starts Klein's chapter on Jarrett. He quotes Michelle Obama on
Jarrett's influence over her husband: "She knows the buttons, the soft spots,
the history, the context."
No one outside Michelle has the access or power over Obama's decision-making
like Jarrett does. Here's an odd little fact that gives some insight into
what kind of president Obama is: Michelle, Michelle's mother, and Valerie,
and only a few others in Washington, are allowed to call Barack by his first
name. After work, Jarrett joins Obama at night in the Family Quarters, where
she dines often with the First Family. She goes on vacation with them.
Jarrett's title is the weird mouthful "Assistant to the President for Public
Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs." She is the gatekeeper, but she is
also much more than that. She occupies Karl Rove's and Hillary's old office
and has an all-access pass to meetings. She shows up at the National Security
Council, at meetings on the economy and budget. She stays behind to advise
Obama on what to think and do. Obama uses her as his left-wing conscience.
Klein's sources describe how at each pressing issue, Obama turns to ask her,
"What do you think the right thing to do is?" As president, he likes to have
her next to him "as the voice of authentic blackness in a White House that is
staffed largely by whites."
A longtime friend told Klein that Jarrett is the "eyes, ears and nose" of the
Obamas. She tells them whom to trust, who is saying what, whom to see at home
and abroad. Michelle wants her there: "I told her ... it would give me a
sense of comfort to know that (Barack) had somebody like her there by his
side." As Obama told the New York Times, "Valerie is one of my oldest
friends. ... I trust her completely."
To understand why Obama relies so heavily on Jarrett, we must remember the
president's identity crisis as a black man, which is the main subject of his
memoir, Dreams from My Father. Valerie Jarrett's adoption of the Obamas as
her friends and protégés in Chicago's upper-crust black society was one of
the greatest things that ever happened to Obama. Until becoming a community
organizer, Obama tells us he felt himself to be an inauthentic American
black. Nothing in his life helped him understand or fit into the American
black community.
Within a few weeks of Obama's birth, conceived out of wedlock as he was, his
mother moved away to a different college, leaving Obama's African birth
father behind in Honolulu. There may have been a shotgun wedding or not -- in
the memoir, Obama says he is not sure. The only time Barack set eyes on his
father was a brief visit when he was ten. Our president lived with his white
mother, then with her and her Indonesian husband in Indonesia from age six to
ten. He was so unhappy that he chose to leave his mother and live with his
white grandparents back in America. Obama's America was the tolerant, wealthy
American world of Honolulu's top prep school.
His only black experience was his grandfather's creepy old friend, Frank
Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Communist and self-disclosed pederast, who
was Obama's voice of authentic blackness. One result of this lonely and
unhappy childhood as a mixed-race child was Barack Obama's envy problem. The
key to understanding Jarrett's power over the president is that Obama didn't
just envy people with normal parents and loving, successful fathers. He
envied American blacks, especially those who grew up in intact black
families, knowing who they were, comfortable in their black skin.
Valerie Jarrett reflects Obama in many ways. Like himself, Valerie looks more
white than black. Her mother had three white grandparents, and her father was
black. Like Obama, she lived in the Muslim world for part of her childhood,
when her father practiced medicine in Iran. Like Obama, she is a committed
leftist. But there are crucial differences. Her father was not a drunk Kenyan
polygamist like Obama's, but a famous pathologist and geneticist. Her mother
was not a leftist expatriate like Obama's, but a distinguished psychologist.
Valerie married into Chicago's black elite, the top rung of African-American
society. She went to Stanford, got a law degree from Michigan, and became
Mayor Richard Daley's deputy chief of staff, "the public black face" of his
administration.
When Valerie Jarrett hired Michelle to work for Daley and befriended her, the
Obamas gained access to the exclusive world of upper-class black Chicago
politics. Valerie knew everyone whom it was important to know in black and
Jewish money circles. She gave Barack entrée and legitimacy. She financed
and promoted his ambitions for national office.
Obama finally belonged. Not that Jarrett's record in Chicago was anything to
be proud of. Jarrett was known for her corruption and incompetence. Daley
finally had to fire her after a scandal erupted over her role in misuse of
public funds in the city's substandard public housing. She went on to become
CEO of Habitat Executive Services, pulling down $300,000 in salary and
$550,000 in deferred compensation. Again, she managed a housing complex that
was seized by government inspectors for slum conditions. The scandal didn't
matter to Obama. The sordid corruption was all part of Jarrett's Chicago
success story.
Every insider in Chicago told Klein the same thing: Jarrett has no
qualifications to be the principal advisor to the president of the United
States. She doesn't understand how Washington works, how relations with
Congress work, how the federal process works. She doesn't understand how the
economy works, how the military works, how national security works. But she
understands how Obama works.
The president turns to Valerie Jarrett for definitive advice on all these
issues. She has given him terrible advice over and over, and still he turns
to her.
Her true job is to make Obama feel proud of himself. When Obama looks at
Jarrett, he sees himself as whole and good and real. He is no longer the fake
black, the fatherless kid flailing around in a white world, tortured by the
unfairness of it all. She fills the emptiness at the core of his identity.
She admires and adores him. Jarrett told New Yorker editor David Remnick that
the president is "just too talented to do what ordinary people do." And the
icing on the cake -- she shares his left-wing politics that project
unfairness out onto white America.
Obama relies on Jarrett to create the White House bubble he likes to live in,
where his narcissism is stroked and his desire to do the big, left-wing thing
is encouraged. Jarrett is the doorman. She runs access to the president. As
Klein puts it, she guards him from meeting with "critics and complainers who
might deflate his ego." No one gets past Jarrett who has an incompatible
point of view.
Jarrett pushed ObamaCare. At the beginning of Obama's presidency, there was
pressure on Obama to focus on the economic crisis. Rahm Emanuel advised a
small, bipartisan health care reform with popular items such as coverage for
young adults -- to get it passed quickly and focus on the country's money
problems. Jarrett urged the president to be true to his left-wing agenda. She
was all for having Reid-Pelosi create the ObamaCare assault on the American
health system and ramming it through on a one-party vote, using Chicago-style
politics, while Obama crossed the country doing what he does best: make
speeches. Obama liked Jarrett's idea. Emanuel is now out of the White House.
Jarrett pushed the Solyndra fiasco. Jarrett promoted Solyndra because one of
her richest Chicago connections, billionaire George Kaiser, a top Obama
bundler, had a 35% share in Solyndra. Kaiser visited the White House sixteen
times.
Larry Summers, the director of the president's National Economic Council,
warned Obama that the federal government should not get involved in venture
capital of any sort. Summers understood that crony capitalism sabotages
economic growth. Huge government funding distorts and destroys whatever
market segment it touches, replacing economic decisions with political ones.
A member of Obama's finance committee warned the president that Solyndra was
going bankrupt. But it is Obama and Valerie who see eye to eye, and they saw
the value to Obama of rewarding his political cronies. It worked fine in
Chicago. Larry Summers is now out of the White House.
Jarrett pushed Obama to take on the Catholic Church over contraception,
arguing that it would appeal to single women (she was right) and that
religious freedom isn't important (she was wrong). Bill Daley, who had
replaced Rahm Emmanuel as chief of staff, argued against Obama pushing
contraception on the Church and invited Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan of
New York to meet with a displeased Obama, who didn't appreciate hearing from
the Church. Daley is now out of the White House.
Valerie Jarrett is the most powerful woman in Washington. She has guided the
president's decisions on health care, the budget, the stimulus, the deficit,
foreign affairs.
So when Jarrett told Obama that the mission to kill bin Laden was too
politically risky, and to play it safe, it is entirely plausible to believe
that the president listened to her. It is consistent with everything we know
about Obama's dependence on her. According to Miniter's source in the U.S.
Military Joint Special Operations Command, Obama listened to her for four
months, dithering and deciding no the first three times the military told him
that the time to get bin Laden was now.
In The Amateur, Klein reports that another worry won out. Obama was even more
scared of the political fallout if voters learned he'd passed up the chance
to get bin Laden. What decided him wasn't the national interest, but
politics. For once, the president disagreed with Valerie Jarrett
[1]
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/obamas_strange_dependence_on_valerie_jarrett.html
Tags: INSERT TAGS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Army’s Manual For Civilian Prison Camps
Army’s Manual For Civilian Prison Camps
------
I ran across the Army’s plans for civilian prison camps the other day.
Here’s the basic information, along with a list of links so you can share
it with your friends. I plan to read all 386 pages; but Chapter 10, page 10
was all I really needed to read:
FM 3-39.40
INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS
10-5. Civil-military operations are the activities of a commander that
establish, maintain, influence, or exploit relations between U.S. armed
forces, governmental and nongovernmental civilian organizations and
authorities, and the civilian population in a friendly, neutral, or hostile
operational area to facilitate military operations and consolidate and
achieve U.S. objectives. Activities conducted by CA personnel enhance the
relationship between U.S. armed forces and civil authorities in areas where
U.S. armed forces are present. Support by CA personnel also involves the
application of their functional specialty skills that are normally the
responsibility of the civil government to enhance the conduct of
civil-military operations. The contribution of CA forces to an operation
centers on their ability to rapidly analyze key civil aspects of the
operational area, develop an implementing concept, and assess its impact
throughout the operation. (See FM 3-05.40 for more information about CA.)
Actions
1
Search and screen
I/R staff, MI personnel, NGOs, IHOs, and IOs
Conduct a pat-down search to ensure that weapons are not brought into the
facility and that the facility is not infiltrated by insurgents.
2
Accountability
I/R staff
Prepare forms and records to maintain the accountability of DCs. Use forms
and records provided by the HN or CA personnel or forms and records used for
detainee operations that may apply to DCs.
3
Identification card or band
I/R staff
Issue an identification card or band to each DC, if required, to ease
facility administration and control.
This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil [1])
and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at
(www.train.army.mil [2]).
The proponent for this publication is the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine
Command. Send comments and recommendations on Department of the Army (DA)
Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to
Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School, ATTN: ATZT-TDD-M, 320 MANSCEN
Loop, Suite 270, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473-8929.
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD
contractors only to protect technical or operational information from
automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other
means. This determination was made on 8 December 2008. Other requests for
this document must be referred to the Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police
School, ATTN: ATZT-TDD-M, 320 MANSCEN Loop, Suite 270, Fort Leonard Wood,
Missouri 65473-8929.
*This publication supersedes FM 3-19.40, 4 September 2007.
Tags: possee comitatus,army,military rule,rulebook,US doctrine,martial law To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
------
I ran across the Army’s plans for civilian prison camps the other day.
Here’s the basic information, along with a list of links so you can share
it with your friends. I plan to read all 386 pages; but Chapter 10, page 10
was all I really needed to read:
FM 3-39.40
INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS
10-5. Civil-military operations are the activities of a commander that
establish, maintain, influence, or exploit relations between U.S. armed
forces, governmental and nongovernmental civilian organizations and
authorities, and the civilian population in a friendly, neutral, or hostile
operational area to facilitate military operations and consolidate and
achieve U.S. objectives. Activities conducted by CA personnel enhance the
relationship between U.S. armed forces and civil authorities in areas where
U.S. armed forces are present. Support by CA personnel also involves the
application of their functional specialty skills that are normally the
responsibility of the civil government to enhance the conduct of
civil-military operations. The contribution of CA forces to an operation
centers on their ability to rapidly analyze key civil aspects of the
operational area, develop an implementing concept, and assess its impact
throughout the operation. (See FM 3-05.40 for more information about CA.)
Actions
1
Search and screen
I/R staff, MI personnel, NGOs, IHOs, and IOs
Conduct a pat-down search to ensure that weapons are not brought into the
facility and that the facility is not infiltrated by insurgents.
2
Accountability
I/R staff
Prepare forms and records to maintain the accountability of DCs. Use forms
and records provided by the HN or CA personnel or forms and records used for
detainee operations that may apply to DCs.
3
Identification card or band
I/R staff
Issue an identification card or band to each DC, if required, to ease
facility administration and control.
This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil [1])
and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at
(www.train.army.mil [2]).
The proponent for this publication is the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine
Command. Send comments and recommendations on Department of the Army (DA)
Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to
Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School, ATTN: ATZT-TDD-M, 320 MANSCEN
Loop, Suite 270, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473-8929.
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD
contractors only to protect technical or operational information from
automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other
means. This determination was made on 8 December 2008. Other requests for
this document must be referred to the Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police
School, ATTN: ATZT-TDD-M, 320 MANSCEN Loop, Suite 270, Fort Leonard Wood,
Missouri 65473-8929.
*This publication supersedes FM 3-19.40, 4 September 2007.
Tags: possee comitatus,army,military rule,rulebook,US doctrine,martial law To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
THIS IS WHY WE SHOULD WITHDRAW FROM THE U.N.
THIS IS WHY WE SHOULD WITHDRAW FROM THE U.N.
------
The NWO plans are funneled through the UN, and we need to withdraw and save
our nation! MJB
‘Unfortunate & ‘Inappropriate’: Iran to Preside Over UN Disarmament
Body — and the U.S. Plans to Boycott
In a move that some critics are calling ironic, problematic, and ill-advised,
Iran will oversee the UN Conference on Disarmament this month.
The Middle Eastern country will take over presidency of the conference from
May 27 through June 23, and is being given the opportunity, AFP notes, based
on an alphabetical rotation of 65 member states.
Considering Ian’s history — mainly allegations that the country is
attempting to develop nuclear weapons — there’s clearly some irony here.
The United States is planning to boycott the meetings during this time,
claiming that Iran should not be allowed to hold official positions in the UN
amid sanctions.
Currently, Iran faces four rounds of ramifications for its purported actions.
Allowing the country to hold this position, the U.S. claims, sends the wrong
message and undercuts the central goals of the UN Conference on Disarmament.
AFP has more:
Iran’s presidency is “unfortunate and highly inappropriate,” said
Pelton. “The United States will not be represented at the ambassadorial
level during any meeting presided over by Iran.”
“The United States continues to believe that countries that are under
Chapter VII sanctions for weapons proliferation or massive human-rights
abuses should be barred from any formal or ceremonial positions in UN
bodies.”
Pelton acknowledged that the conference presidency is largely ceremonial with
no responsibilities.
Regardless of how prominent the role is, the U.S. is doubling down — and
isn’t alone in its criticism.
“This is like putting Jack the Ripper in charge of a women’s shelter,”
said Hillel Neuer, who heads UN Watch, a Geneva-based group.
Tags: UN,Iran,liars,withdraw from UN,disarmament conference To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
------
The NWO plans are funneled through the UN, and we need to withdraw and save
our nation! MJB
‘Unfortunate & ‘Inappropriate’: Iran to Preside Over UN Disarmament
Body — and the U.S. Plans to Boycott
In a move that some critics are calling ironic, problematic, and ill-advised,
Iran will oversee the UN Conference on Disarmament this month.
The Middle Eastern country will take over presidency of the conference from
May 27 through June 23, and is being given the opportunity, AFP notes, based
on an alphabetical rotation of 65 member states.
Considering Ian’s history — mainly allegations that the country is
attempting to develop nuclear weapons — there’s clearly some irony here.
The United States is planning to boycott the meetings during this time,
claiming that Iran should not be allowed to hold official positions in the UN
amid sanctions.
Currently, Iran faces four rounds of ramifications for its purported actions.
Allowing the country to hold this position, the U.S. claims, sends the wrong
message and undercuts the central goals of the UN Conference on Disarmament.
AFP has more:
Iran’s presidency is “unfortunate and highly inappropriate,” said
Pelton. “The United States will not be represented at the ambassadorial
level during any meeting presided over by Iran.”
“The United States continues to believe that countries that are under
Chapter VII sanctions for weapons proliferation or massive human-rights
abuses should be barred from any formal or ceremonial positions in UN
bodies.”
Pelton acknowledged that the conference presidency is largely ceremonial with
no responsibilities.
Regardless of how prominent the role is, the U.S. is doubling down — and
isn’t alone in its criticism.
“This is like putting Jack the Ripper in charge of a women’s shelter,”
said Hillel Neuer, who heads UN Watch, a Geneva-based group.
Tags: UN,Iran,liars,withdraw from UN,disarmament conference To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
The IRS illegally gave a socialist group records on Conservatives
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/14/Progressive-Group-Says-IRS-Gave-Them-Confidential-Docs-On-Conservative-Groups
Tags: IRS,scofflaws,socialists,progressives,illegal documents,liberals,liars To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Tags: IRS,scofflaws,socialists,progressives,illegal documents,liberals,liars To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
No end to the lies of this administration
A Thorn in CBS News' side
------
I'm starting off today with a couple of 'replays' of posts on Blasted Fools
in which last year – in the direct aftermath of the Benghazi betrayal, I
saluted a couple of ladies who braved the status quo in their own news
organizations to reveal truth and demand answers. Those women were Sharyl
Atkisson and Lara Logan.
The first flashback post, is on Ms. Atkisson, who has been under much
internal pressure and criticism from her employer – CBS TV, for making
things too hot for the Obama administration. The intrepid nature of Ms.
Atkisson's reporting on not just Benghazi, but Fast and Furious and other
nefarious acts of the Obama crime syndicate, has made the brass at CBS
uncomfortable and so they've been returning the favor.
Breitbart's John Nolte summarizes some remarkable details on why Sheryl
Atkisson is persona non grata among the higher ups at CBS News:
1. According to ABC News, Obama's national security advisor Ben Rhoades was
deeply involved in the editing of the CIA talking points.
2. These same CIA talking points are central to what many believe is a White
House coverup.
3. Ben Rhoades is the brother of CBS News president David Rhoades.
4. At CBS News, Sharyl Attkisson is one of the only mainstream media
journalists with the dogged determination and moral courage to demand the
truth about the White House's involvement in the CIA talking points.
5. For months now reports have surfaced that Attkisson's bosses are unhappy
with her, that she has trouble getting her Libya stories on the air, and that
she's being accused of engaging in "advocacy."
That's how the Obama Industrial Media Complex (I'm going to copyright that),
sees straight up and unvarnished reporting on the White House's treachery and
negligence – 'advocacy'. I would have to say that's laughable – if ever
there was a textbook example of the pot, pointing the finger at the kettle!
Well – enjoy today's replay No. 1 – which many might not have seen the
first time around, and I'll be back a bit later with replay No. 2, about
another CBS News employee that has been giving them and Obama fits.
No end to the lies of this administration
Tags: INSERT TAGS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
------
I'm starting off today with a couple of 'replays' of posts on Blasted Fools
in which last year – in the direct aftermath of the Benghazi betrayal, I
saluted a couple of ladies who braved the status quo in their own news
organizations to reveal truth and demand answers. Those women were Sharyl
Atkisson and Lara Logan.
The first flashback post, is on Ms. Atkisson, who has been under much
internal pressure and criticism from her employer – CBS TV, for making
things too hot for the Obama administration. The intrepid nature of Ms.
Atkisson's reporting on not just Benghazi, but Fast and Furious and other
nefarious acts of the Obama crime syndicate, has made the brass at CBS
uncomfortable and so they've been returning the favor.
Breitbart's John Nolte summarizes some remarkable details on why Sheryl
Atkisson is persona non grata among the higher ups at CBS News:
1. According to ABC News, Obama's national security advisor Ben Rhoades was
deeply involved in the editing of the CIA talking points.
2. These same CIA talking points are central to what many believe is a White
House coverup.
3. Ben Rhoades is the brother of CBS News president David Rhoades.
4. At CBS News, Sharyl Attkisson is one of the only mainstream media
journalists with the dogged determination and moral courage to demand the
truth about the White House's involvement in the CIA talking points.
5. For months now reports have surfaced that Attkisson's bosses are unhappy
with her, that she has trouble getting her Libya stories on the air, and that
she's being accused of engaging in "advocacy."
That's how the Obama Industrial Media Complex (I'm going to copyright that),
sees straight up and unvarnished reporting on the White House's treachery and
negligence – 'advocacy'. I would have to say that's laughable – if ever
there was a textbook example of the pot, pointing the finger at the kettle!
Well – enjoy today's replay No. 1 – which many might not have seen the
first time around, and I'll be back a bit later with replay No. 2, about
another CBS News employee that has been giving them and Obama fits.
No end to the lies of this administration
Tags: INSERT TAGS To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Dad's really are imprtant to the welbeing of infants and children. Who knew?
Nope, it is not politically correct to say that Dad's are imprtant to the safety, welfare, and health of infants and children. The fact that it is truth is simply ignored by the simplistic socialist feminist press and their sycophants in Congress.
The Courageous Dads Simulcast - Encouraging and supporting Heroic Fatherhood - Friday, June 14th
------
More info at: http://www.courageousdads.com/ [1]
----------------------------------
According to the National Fatherhood Initiative: “Children in father-absent homes are almost four times more likely to be poor. Children born to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born to married mothers.
“Infant mortality rates are 1.8 times higher for infants of unmarried
mothers than for married mothers.” Being raised without a dad “raises the
risk of teen pregnancy, marrying with less than a high school degree, and
forming a marriage where both partners have less than a high school degree.
There is significantly more drug use among children who do not live with both
their mother and father.”
Yikes!
And our old friend Chuck Colson saw the big difference that good fathers
make. “Our prison systems are full of people who never had the example of a
courageous father—or any father at all,” Chuck said. “Over 70 percent
of long-term prison inmates come from broken homes, and young men raised in
fatherless households are at least twice as likely to be incarcerated as
those from intact families.”
So there’s a lot of research showing that dads are absolutely
indispensable. We get that. And yet, because of busyness, cultural pressures
brought to bear on our kids, and other factors, even Christian dads struggle
with being present and engaged with their families. Too often we dads
struggle to lead in our homes and provide a godly example.
It’s not that we’re unwilling; some of us just don’t know how to get
started. Which is why I’m thrilled to tell you about a strategic new
initiative to help dads across America on Father’s Day weekend in June.
Last November, over sixty key fathering leaders, influencers and pastors came
together at an event called The Fatherhood CoMission Summit in Rome, Georgia.
They strategized and prayed about how to help churches assist fathers in
their divinely ordained role.
What came out of this gathering was the “Courageous Dads Simulcast.” This
encouraging, fun, and instructive 90-minute program features quality speakers
such as Dennis Rainey, Stephen and Alex Kendrick, comedian Michael Jr., and a
host of pro athletes and recording artists.
The 90-minute simulcast will air Friday, June 14. There’s still time for
you to get your church or men’s group—or even just yourself—signed up.
“Courageous Dads: Stepping up to Heroic Fatherhood”
More info at: http://www.courageousdads.com http://www.courageousdads.com/
Tags: fathers,dads,feminists,importance of fatherhood,reality, safety,welbeing,welfare,single mothers, To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!courageous dads
The Courageous Dads Simulcast - Encouraging and supporting Heroic Fatherhood - Friday, June 14th
------
More info at: http://www.courageousdads.com/ [1]
----------------------------------
According to the National Fatherhood Initiative: “Children in father-absent homes are almost four times more likely to be poor. Children born to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born to married mothers.
“Infant mortality rates are 1.8 times higher for infants of unmarried
mothers than for married mothers.” Being raised without a dad “raises the
risk of teen pregnancy, marrying with less than a high school degree, and
forming a marriage where both partners have less than a high school degree.
There is significantly more drug use among children who do not live with both
their mother and father.”
Yikes!
And our old friend Chuck Colson saw the big difference that good fathers
make. “Our prison systems are full of people who never had the example of a
courageous father—or any father at all,” Chuck said. “Over 70 percent
of long-term prison inmates come from broken homes, and young men raised in
fatherless households are at least twice as likely to be incarcerated as
those from intact families.”
So there’s a lot of research showing that dads are absolutely
indispensable. We get that. And yet, because of busyness, cultural pressures
brought to bear on our kids, and other factors, even Christian dads struggle
with being present and engaged with their families. Too often we dads
struggle to lead in our homes and provide a godly example.
It’s not that we’re unwilling; some of us just don’t know how to get
started. Which is why I’m thrilled to tell you about a strategic new
initiative to help dads across America on Father’s Day weekend in June.
Last November, over sixty key fathering leaders, influencers and pastors came
together at an event called The Fatherhood CoMission Summit in Rome, Georgia.
They strategized and prayed about how to help churches assist fathers in
their divinely ordained role.
What came out of this gathering was the “Courageous Dads Simulcast.” This
encouraging, fun, and instructive 90-minute program features quality speakers
such as Dennis Rainey, Stephen and Alex Kendrick, comedian Michael Jr., and a
host of pro athletes and recording artists.
The 90-minute simulcast will air Friday, June 14. There’s still time for
you to get your church or men’s group—or even just yourself—signed up.
“Courageous Dads: Stepping up to Heroic Fatherhood”
More info at: http://www.courageousdads.com http://www.courageousdads.com/
Tags: fathers,dads,feminists,importance of fatherhood,reality, safety,welbeing,welfare,single mothers, To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!courageous dads
Yes, getting brutally raped is a definite wake-up call and is bound to change the minds of even the most rabid feminist socialist reporter. It is possible that some integrity still exists in a few pockets of resistance amongst our popular media reporters.
CBS Second 'Sore Thumb'
------
My second CBS 'rogue reporter' du jour is Ms. Lara Logan, who you might remember as the young woman, who while in Egypt, covering the rebellion and protests, was brutally sexually attacked by a mob of thugs in Tahrir Square.
I covered her speech last October at the Better Government Association's Annual Luncheon. Some of her fellow reporters in the broadcast media were surprised and taken aback at her stinging indictment of the way the Afghan
campaign and the Benghazi betrayal was handled by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Pentagon, NSA Director Panetta and Obama, himself. Some of the
key points in her speech were:
- her charge that “I knew we were being lied to, I knew we were being misled”
- General Allen, alluding to the mismanagement of the Afghan campaign, in which he states “We're willing to sacrifice a lot for this campaign, but we're not willing to be murdered for it”.
- Ms. Logan's conclusion that the Taliban and Al Queda have infiltrated the Afghan military and Police, and that “Pakistan is the root of the problem”.
- The Obama Administration, as in so many other areas, is engaged in “a major lie being propagated about the real situation”.
There was a lot in Ms. Logan's speech to cause her bosses at CBS to grind their teeth – not the least of which was this:
“And when I look at what’s happening in Libya, there is a big song and dance about whether this was a terrorist attack or a protest and you just want to scream, ‘for God’s sake!, are you kidding me? The last time we were attacked like this was the U.S.S. Cole, which was a prelude to the 1998
Embassy bombings, which was a prelude to 9/11…and you’re sending in the FBI to investigate?
I have the video of the speech embedded in the post. I've never quite seen anyone working in the belly of the beast of the legacy media speak with this much bluntness and fire. She and her fellow reporter, Sheryl Atkisson, define
journalistic integrity.
journalistic-integrity-not-always-an-oxymoron/
http://blastedfools.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/journalistic-integrity-not-always-an-oxymoron/
Tags: rape,journalism,muslims,islam,pakistan,administration,liars,department of state,media To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
CBS Second 'Sore Thumb'
------
My second CBS 'rogue reporter' du jour is Ms. Lara Logan, who you might remember as the young woman, who while in Egypt, covering the rebellion and protests, was brutally sexually attacked by a mob of thugs in Tahrir Square.
I covered her speech last October at the Better Government Association's Annual Luncheon. Some of her fellow reporters in the broadcast media were surprised and taken aback at her stinging indictment of the way the Afghan
campaign and the Benghazi betrayal was handled by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Pentagon, NSA Director Panetta and Obama, himself. Some of the
key points in her speech were:
- her charge that “I knew we were being lied to, I knew we were being misled”
- General Allen, alluding to the mismanagement of the Afghan campaign, in which he states “We're willing to sacrifice a lot for this campaign, but we're not willing to be murdered for it”.
- Ms. Logan's conclusion that the Taliban and Al Queda have infiltrated the Afghan military and Police, and that “Pakistan is the root of the problem”.
- The Obama Administration, as in so many other areas, is engaged in “a major lie being propagated about the real situation”.
There was a lot in Ms. Logan's speech to cause her bosses at CBS to grind their teeth – not the least of which was this:
“And when I look at what’s happening in Libya, there is a big song and dance about whether this was a terrorist attack or a protest and you just want to scream, ‘for God’s sake!, are you kidding me? The last time we were attacked like this was the U.S.S. Cole, which was a prelude to the 1998
Embassy bombings, which was a prelude to 9/11…and you’re sending in the FBI to investigate?
I have the video of the speech embedded in the post. I've never quite seen anyone working in the belly of the beast of the legacy media speak with this much bluntness and fire. She and her fellow reporter, Sheryl Atkisson, define
journalistic integrity.
journalistic-integrity-not-always-an-oxymoron/
http://blastedfools.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/journalistic-integrity-not-always-an-oxymoron/
Tags: rape,journalism,muslims,islam,pakistan,administration,liars,department of state,media To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Saturday, May 11, 2013
25 Reasons To Dislike Liberals
John Hawkins | May 11, 2013Is every liberal an immoral, nasty tempered, habitual liar who accuses people of racism for fun and trashes his own country because he thinks it makes him look sophisticated? Of course, not! On the other hand, is that a fairly accurate description of most liberals in politics? Yes, it is. Most of them aren't evil per se, but as Margaret Thatcher said,
"Left-wing zealots have often been prepared to ride roughshod over due process and basic considerations of fairness when they think they can get away with it. For them the ends always seems to justify the means. That is precisely how their predecessors came to create the gulag."
Liberals view themselves as good people because they're liberals. People who are outside of that ugly little bit of circular reasoning don't have such a benign view of their horrible behavior. So, what reason could you have to dislike liberals?
1) Only liberals would be cruel enough to pick on kids running lemonade stands with a permit, children putting on Christmas plays at school and the Boy Scouts.
2) Because the closest thing to Sodom and Gomorrah in the modern world is San Francisco and Berkeley.
3) Whether you're talking about cop killers, terrorists, radical Islamists or dictators, all you have to do is say, "I hate America," and liberals start to sympathize with you.
4) Liberals are actually bothered by people who do love America. On the rare occasion when you do see a liberal waving a flag, look for a camera.
5) The same people who voted Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama into office think they're smarter than tradition, the Founding Fathers and God Himself.
6) Liberals might not want to admit it, but the world would have been a better place if Mary Jo Kopechne had crawled up out of that car instead of Ted Kennedy.
7) Only an ass could like Bill Maher, Alan Grayson or Sheila Jackson Lee.
8) Liberals believe in taking money from people who earn it, handing it out as bribes in order to get more power and then using that power to hurt the people that are giving them money.
9) The same liberal who'll laugh at a rape joke about Sarah Palin and then attack Michele Bachmann's family will then turn around and accuse someone else of being sexist for respectfully noting that a woman is attractive.
10) Liberals view hooking people on welfare and food stamps as a core part of their election strategy, which is terrible for the country, shows they have no character and requires more than a little hatred for poor people.
11) The dumbest, most close-minded and mean spirited people in all of politics are inevitably liberals who are convinced they're brilliant, open-minded and compassionate because they call themselves liberals.
12) A policy that makes liberals feel superior and caring that doesn't work and wastes billions is considered a smashing success because they genuinely DON'T CARE WHETHER THEIR POLICIES ACTUALLY HELP PEOPLE OR NOT.
13) The same liberal who pretends to be angry about Susan Smith or Casey Anthony will then turn around and give the thumbs up to women who do the same thing to their children via abortion.
14) There's a reason why the average homeschooled kid gets a better education than he would in a public school run by liberals. It's because the kid's parents are interested in educating him while his liberal teachers view public schools as just another way to indoctrinate children.
15) Noam Chomsky is an America-hating creep and to think of him as some kind of genius, you have to both despise our country enough to suspend your disbelief and be largely ignorant of world history.
16) Anyone whose first reaction after a terrorist attack is, "Why do they hate us?" is just an intolerable douche.
17) Liberals talk up Hillary Clinton as the most prominent and important female politician in America; yet her entire political career is based on the fact that she married Bill Clinton. That's actually kind of pathetic.
18) Liberals have been big supporters of slavery, Indian massacres, the KKK, eugenics, fascism, communism and Jim Crow laws. Then, down the road, after liberals finally join everyone else, they try to claim that conservatives still support all the practices that we fought liberals on from the beginning.
19) Liberals think black Americans are inferior to whites, which is why the worst, most crime-ridden places to live in America are inevitably run by liberals. That's acceptable to liberals because they don't think black Americans deserve any better.
20) A liberal is more likely to support a man who murders a cop like Mumia Abu Jamal than cops who want to regularly patrol a bad neighborhood in force to keep the criminals from terrorizing the innocent people who live there.
21) The average middle aged Tea Partier who's going to rallies, talking about the Constitution and calling for reduced spending cares more about "the children" than 99% of the liberals out there who demand that we support one stupid program after the other "for the children."
22) You have to be a horrible human being to be okay with terrorists like Bill Ayers teaching kids at a college.
23) Because liberals are unable to ever admit they're wrong, they systematically ruin and destroy everything they become involved with and then either point the finger elsewhere or demand even more government involvement to fix the problems they created.
24) Detroit – and, yes, liberals did that.
25) Even "liberal Christians" are generally supportive of other liberals who attack Christianity, which is why "liberal Christians" is in quotes.
Tags: liberals,leftists,socialists,bores,immoral,anti-american,anti-christian,terrorists,criminals To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Thursday, May 09, 2013
Benghazi, Obama
and Hillary
The House
Oversight Committee hearings on Benghazi began and we’re going to learn that
0bama and Hillary Clinton were informed almost immediately that the attack on
the Benghazi consulate was being waged by Islamic jihadists connected to al
Qaeda. Then we’re going to learn that 0bama and Hillary immediately went into
protective mode … protecting Obama’s reelection efforts and Hillary’s chances
for 2016. And it is not going to make a bit of difference to the Media.
0bama had to
protect his narrative. Al Qaeda was on the run and all but decimated, right? Hillary?
She had incompetence to cover up. She knew the consulate had requested
additional security and protection, and her chain of command said no resulting
in four dead Americans including an Ambassador. Her 3:00 am phone call came and
her phone was turned off.
There was
one current and one future presidency to be saved so a narrative was presented
to America clearing 0bama and Hillary of culpability. Not only did they come up
with a phony YouTube video lie, they also used the police power of the
Executive branch of government to take an unknown American video producer from
California and jam him in jail on spurious (at best) charges to support their
phony and entirely contrived YouTube video narrative lie.
Now as the
hearings run, we have pols predicting dreadful times ahead for 0bama with predictions
ranging from a Watergate-style scandal to outright impeachment. Forget it.
Ain’t going to happen. It is a dream.
Only a few
Americans care about any 0bama cover-up. They are more likely to buy into White
House Spokesman Jay Carney’s “That was a long time ago” narrative, or Hillary’s
“What difference does it make” rant than they are to actually care about a
deliberate, lying cover-up of the reasons behind the death of four Americans.
These are Democrats and the media will wash them clean.
When the
Watergate scandal broke, we had New York and D.C. press corps with burning
desires to destroy Richard Nixon, a GOPer. 0bama and Benghazi have the same
press corps ready to do anything it can get away with to protect their God-like
hero and preserve his presidency. “But people died in Benghazi!” you say? That’s
not enough to stop 0bama hero-worship among the Fourth Estate.
What about
the American people? Really? You believe the same people who put this colossal
failure back into the White House for four more years is going to get worked up
over Benghazi? Why? It doesn't directly affect them.
The American
people are more concerned with with 24/7 discussions about college football
recruiting and gay NBA players. The majority of Americans are more worried about
acquiring and keeping monthly checks from the government than 0bama’s continued
lies or foreign policy failures. Most think Benghazi is a small yappy dog ttype
of news only of concern to Conservatives.
Most people
are more concerned about Winter home heating assistance checks, getting more federal dollars for child care,
who is going to pay their medical bills, how they can get their hands on those
great Section 8 housing vouchers. Some are looking to upgrade their
0bamaPhones.
How many
people do we have on Social Security disability right now, 12 million Americans?
These people are concered about keeping
those checks coming. You surely can’t expect them to get out there and work for
a living, can you?
There’s
millions more who’s concern is ensuring their unemployment benefits don’t run
out and more waiting for 0bama to make their boss pay them more than they’re worth
on their jobs.
Benghazi
0bama’s Watergate? For that to happen, we'd need concerned citizens who
actually care and media doing objective jobs. Both are in short supply. It may
be a great show but in the end it adds up to nothing.
PL Booth,
www.blueeyeview.blogspot.com 5/9/13
Tags: Benghazi,obama,hillary,cover-up,hearings,politicians,media,concerns,americans To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Susan Stamper Brown | May 08, 2013
Benghazi: Are We A Nation Run By Fools?
It seems like only yesterday when President Obama stood in
front of an electrified audience at the 2012 Democratic National Convention just days before the deadly September 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, reminding supporters, "al Qaeda is on the path to defeat and Osama bin Laden is dead."
Days later, on September 14, a somber-faced Obama and his sullen-faced Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stood in front of four flag draped coffins at Andrews Air Force Base, assuring the small group of grieving family members their loved ones did not die in vain. Their ill-informed message suggested these patriots weren't killed by terrorists; they died because of protests about a YouTube video.
Since then, the administration has done its best to dodge questions and distance itself from the events of September 11, and acquired a convenient case of amnesia along the way. Nine months-in and Americans still have no clue why initial talking points from top officials' claiming the attacks were most likely executed by al Qaeda-linked terrorists were reduced to "a YouTube video." Did they fear acknowledging such a claim so close to the 2012 presidential election? Or did they actually believe the video story?
Hopefully, some of these questions were answered by way of three courageous State Department whistle-blowers scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee May 8. Pre-hearing interviews from one of the whistleblowers, Gregory Hicks, the second highest diplomat in Libya at the time of the attacks, were released to the press. Hicks claimed a Special Forces team, which could have saved lives and protected evidence, was ordered to "stand down" despite multiple pleas for help. Contrary to the administration's claims, Hicks also said, "...everybody in the mission thought it was a terrorist attack" from the beginning.
Hicks' statements seem to fit in with the timeline obtained by the Weekly Standard from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The Weekly Standard article "The Benghazi Talking Points," describes how "senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened" and made "substantive revisions" to the "CIA's talking points" six weeks outside the 2012 presidential election.
So where's your thirst for truth, America? Why aren't we outraged? Maybe because, as White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, "Benghazi happened a long time ago." Maybe Carney should ask grieving family members wanting answers and longing for closure how long it's been since their loved ones lost their lives in Benghazi. Or maybe we are at a point in this country where a politician's political aspirations trump everything else.
The last time something of this magnitude happened, a U.S. president stepped down. But that was during a time when good men who made bad choices still had the intestinal fortitude to accept personal responsibility for their actions. It was also a time when journalists were principled enough to set aside politics to do their job and make politicians accountable.
Some in the mainstream media are reluctantly pulling their heads out of the ground. On May 5, CBS news anchor Bob Schieffer acknowledged the possibility the administration might have been involved in a "cover-up." Others are unenthusiastically following suit because they have no choice. Of course, the illegitimate diehards will remain with their heads in the sand until the storm passes.
As the pieces of this puzzle come together, one thing is certain: Full and honest disclosure is always the best policy. Regardless of how Benghazi pans out, we will discover that either the Obama administration was involved in a cover-up and played us as fools, or our government is run by fools who actually believed the Benghazi attacks were in response to an uprising over an amateurish anti-Islam video by a man now serving jail time for a separate issue. Either way, we lose.
Tags: government,fools,liberals,socialists,benghazi,liars,clinton,obama,death To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
Parental Consent
Tags: liberal judges,parental consent,parental rights,age of consent,supporting immorality To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the The Blue View From MO Thanks!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)